From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32966 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2016 13:06:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32953 invoked by uid 89); 12 Apr 2016 13:06:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=worried, DOC X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:06:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 128F26406D; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-5-205.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.205]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3CD6AXM020355; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:06:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [DOC Patch] Add sample for @cc constraint To: David Wohlferd References: <56E4E5D6.4030500@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56F40103.8080600@redhat.com> <56F85899.4010201@LimeGreenSocks.com> <56FA6B82.9080308@redhat.com> <56FF06A7.8040900@LimeGreenSocks.com> <570C29F9.5080305@LimeGreenSocks.com> Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Richard Henderson , Sandra Loosemore From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <570CF2C2.1000108@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:06:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <570C29F9.5080305@LimeGreenSocks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00514.txt.bz2 On 04/12/2016 12:49 AM, David Wohlferd wrote: >> First draft is attached. It tests all 28 (14 conditions plus 14 >> inverted). I wasn't sure what to set for optimization (O2? O3? O0?), >> so I left the default. I've had it in a successful test run, and committed it with a minor tweak (__builtin_abort vs return 1). As for the docs, I think you are unnecessarily worried about things that are never going to be a problem in practice. Bernd