From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82814 invoked by alias); 4 May 2016 20:11:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 82800 invoked by uid 89); 4 May 2016 20:11:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:568, Today X-HELO: aserp1040.oracle.com Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (HELO aserp1040.oracle.com) (141.146.126.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 04 May 2016 20:11:03 +0000 Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u44KB1wn010957 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 4 May 2016 20:11:01 GMT Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u44KB0rG022177 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 4 May 2016 20:11:01 GMT Received: from abhmp0013.oracle.com (abhmp0013.oracle.com [141.146.116.19]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u44KB0nV027822; Wed, 4 May 2016 20:11:00 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.4] (/79.37.130.43) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 04 May 2016 13:10:59 -0700 Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 68722 To: Jason Merrill , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" References: <57083607.4050000@oracle.com> <570CFDCD.70403@redhat.com> From: Paolo Carlini Message-ID: <572A5751.8070107@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 20:11:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <570CFDCD.70403@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00348.txt.bz2 Hi again, On 12/04/2016 15:53, Jason Merrill wrote: > Let's go with the first patch. What about this one? Today I returned to it, and technically it still represents a regression in gcc-4_9-branch and gcc-5-branch, but personally I'd rather not backport the fix: in release-mode we just emit an additional "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" at the end of a rather long series of diagnostic messages, the first ones meaningful, the last redundant anyway and the snippet triggering it seems particularly broken to me... Thanks, Paolo.