Hi,

On 23/05/2016 15:32, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 05/22/2016 02:26 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> finally sending a patch for this issue. As noticed by submitter himself,
>> it appears to boil down to a rather straightforward case of not
>> rejecting unexpanded parameter packs in default arguments. In order to
>> handle all the combinations (in/out of class, template
>> parameter/function parameter) I added calls of
>> check_for_bare_parameter_packs both to cp_parser_default_argument and
>> cp_parser_late_parsing_default_args
>
> Hmm, would it make sense to check in cp_parser_initializer?
Oh yes. The below is already past g++.dg/tm...

Thanks!
Paolo.

////////////////////