From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7059 invoked by alias); 31 May 2016 08:15:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7049 invoked by uid 89); 31 May 2016 08:15:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=approvals, his X-HELO: foss.arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.101.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:15:42 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D8728; Tue, 31 May 2016 01:16:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.2.206.43] (e100706-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.2.206.43]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA67D3F252; Tue, 31 May 2016 01:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <574D4829.9090408@foss.arm.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 10:10:00 -0000 From: Kyrill Tkachov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Pfeifer CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, James Greenhalgh Subject: Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs] Improve arm and aarch64-related info in readings.html References: <573DDB63.40101@foss.arm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg02382.txt.bz2 Hi Gerald, On 28/05/16 21:04, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Hi Kyrill, > > On Thu, 19 May 2016, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: >> I noticed that we have a readings.html page that has pointers to >> documentation of various backends that GCC supports. The info on arm >> seems a bit out of date and somewhat confusing, and there is no entry >> for aarch64. This patch tries to address that. > I see you have not applied this yet. In case you were waiting > for any further approvals beyond James': (a) His is sufficient > for doc and web pages around AArch64, and (b) I agree, too. :-) I was going to apply it (with James's suggestions) but I got sidetracked by other things. I'll do it today. Thanks, Kyrill > Gerald