From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 127346 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2016 18:33:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 127287 invoked by uid 89); 2 Jun 2016 18:33:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 02 Jun 2016 18:33:04 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-02x.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.96.206] helo=SVR-ORW-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1b8XQT-0006Jq-8X from Sandra_Loosemore@mentor.com ; Thu, 02 Jun 2016 11:33:01 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.96.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:33:00 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 interrupt attribute patch [2/2] To: "Koval, Julia" , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" References: <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F03CFFF3B@CDSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <57323E4F.8060309@codesourcery.com> <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F03D14E00@CDSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <574C966E.2000005@codesourcery.com> <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F03D15391@CDSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> CC: "Lu, Hongjiu" , "vaalfreja@gmail.com" , "ubizjak@gmail.com" , "law@redhat.com" , "Zamyatin, Igor" From: Sandra Loosemore Message-ID: <57507BDC.10006@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 18:33:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F03D15391@CDSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2 On 06/01/2016 08:19 AM, Koval, Julia wrote: > diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi > index 2d4f028..3e6a796 100644 > --- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi > +++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi > @@ -5266,6 +5266,79 @@ On x86-32 targets, the @code{stdcall} attribute causes the compiler to > assume that the called function pops off the stack space used to > pass arguments, unless it takes a variable number of arguments. > > +@item no_caller_saved_registers > +@cindex @code{no_caller_saved_registers} function attribute, x86 > +Use this attribute to indicate that the specified function has no > +caller-saved registers. That is, all registers are callee-saved. For > +example, this attribute can be used for a function, called from an s/function,/function/ The documentation parts are OK with that change. -Sandra