Re: [tuples] Fixed inconsistent iterator interface

["Christopher Matthews" <chrismatthews@google.com>]

I was confused when I saw it - thought itter was more descriptive.  I
now notice that's how it is done everywhere. I'll change it back to i.

On 8/7/07, Christopher Matthews <chrismatthews@google.com> wrote:
> ops. Included some stuff from another patch I was working on. Here is an update
>
> On 8/7/07, Christopher Matthews <chrismatthews@google.com> wrote:
> > Some of the functions in the gimple statement iterator had struct
> > arguments, others had pointer arguments. Changed them to all use
> > pointers, and update all the (now much nicer looking) uses.
> >
> > Tested on gimple.exp, compile.exp, and libgcc.
> >
> > 2007-08-07  Chris Matthews  <chrismatthews@google.com>
> >
> >         * gimple_iterator.h (gsi_start): Changed to produce a pointer instead of
> >         struct.  Updated clients.
> >         (gsi_last): Same.
> >         (gsi_end_p): Changed to operate on a pointer instead of struct.  Updated
> >         clients.
> >         (gsi_one_before_end_p): Same.
> >         (gsi_next): Same.
> >         (gsi_prev): Same.
> >         (gsi_stmt): Same.
> >
> >
>
>