From: "Christopher Matthews" <chrismatthews@google.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Diego <dnovillo@google.com>,
"Aldy Hernandez" <aldyh@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [tuples] Fixed inconsistent iterator interface
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 23:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5794c4c80708071607k188d5cebx648c367d7e3c4e98@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5794c4c80708071556x6ee1bebcu4c0567fc6ed4fffc@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1240 bytes --]
All suggested changes made.
On 8/7/07, Christopher Matthews <chrismatthews@google.com> wrote:
> I was confused when I saw it - thought itter was more descriptive. I
> now notice that's how it is done everywhere. I'll change it back to i.
>
> On 8/7/07, Christopher Matthews <chrismatthews@google.com> wrote:
> > ops. Included some stuff from another patch I was working on. Here is an update
> >
> > On 8/7/07, Christopher Matthews <chrismatthews@google.com> wrote:
> > > Some of the functions in the gimple statement iterator had struct
> > > arguments, others had pointer arguments. Changed them to all use
> > > pointers, and update all the (now much nicer looking) uses.
> > >
> > > Tested on gimple.exp, compile.exp, and libgcc.
> > >
> > > 2007-08-07 Chris Matthews <chrismatthews@google.com>
> > >
> > > * gimple_iterator.h (gsi_start): Changed to produce a pointer instead of
> > > struct. Updated clients.
> > > (gsi_last): Same.
> > > (gsi_end_p): Changed to operate on a pointer instead of struct. Updated
> > > clients.
> > > (gsi_one_before_end_p): Same.
> > > (gsi_next): Same.
> > > (gsi_prev): Same.
> > > (gsi_stmt): Same.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
[-- Attachment #2: gsi_ptrv1.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4952 bytes --]
Index: gcc/gimple-iterator.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/gimple-iterator.h (revision 127279)
+++ gcc/gimple-iterator.h (working copy)
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. */
#ifndef GCC_SEQ_ITERATOR_H
#define GCC_SEQ_ITERATOR_H
-
+#include "ggc.h"
/* Iterator object for GIMPLE statement sequences. */
typedef struct {
@@ -31,26 +31,26 @@ typedef struct {
/* Return a new iterator initially pointing to GIMPLE_SEQ's first statement. */
-static inline gimple_stmt_iterator
+static inline gimple_stmt_iterator *
gsi_start (gimple_seq seq)
{
- gimple_stmt_iterator i;
+ gimple_stmt_iterator *i = ggc_alloc_cleared (sizeof (gimple_stmt_iterator));
- i.stmt = gimple_seq_first (seq);
- i.seq = seq;
+ i->stmt = gimple_seq_first (seq);
+ i->seq = seq;
return i;
}
/* Return a new iterator initially pointing to GIMPLE_SEQ's last statement. */
-static inline gimple_stmt_iterator
+static inline gimple_stmt_iterator *
gsi_last (gimple_seq seq)
{
- gimple_stmt_iterator i;
+ gimple_stmt_iterator *i = ggc_alloc_cleared (sizeof (gimple_stmt_iterator));
- i.stmt = gimple_seq_last (seq);
- i.seq = seq;
+ i->stmt = gimple_seq_last (seq);
+ i->seq = seq;
return i;
}
@@ -58,17 +58,17 @@ gsi_last (gimple_seq seq)
/* Return TRUE if at the end of I. */
static inline bool
-gsi_end_p (gimple_stmt_iterator i)
+gsi_end_p (gimple_stmt_iterator *i)
{
- return i.stmt == NULL;
+ return i->stmt == NULL;
}
/* Return TRUE if we're one statement before the end of I. */
static inline bool
-gsi_one_before_end_p (gimple_stmt_iterator i)
+gsi_one_before_end_p (gimple_stmt_iterator *i)
{
- return i.stmt == gimple_seq_last (i.seq);
+ return i->stmt == gimple_seq_last (i->seq);
}
/* Return the next gimple statement in I. */
@@ -104,9 +104,9 @@ gsi_prev (gimple_stmt_iterator *i)
/* Return the current stmt. */
static inline gimple
-gsi_stmt (gimple_stmt_iterator i)
+gsi_stmt (gimple_stmt_iterator *i)
{
- return i.stmt;
+ return i->stmt;
}
#endif /* GCC_SEQ_ITERATOR_H */
Index: gcc/gimple-pretty-print.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/gimple-pretty-print.c (revision 127279)
+++ gcc/gimple-pretty-print.c (working copy)
@@ -107,9 +107,9 @@ print_gimple_stmt (FILE *file, gimple g,
static void
dump_gimple_seq (pretty_printer *buffer, gimple_seq seq, int spc, int flags)
{
- gimple_stmt_iterator i;
+ gimple_stmt_iterator *i;
- for (i = gsi_start (seq); !gsi_end_p (i); gsi_next (&i))
+ for (i = gsi_start (seq); !gsi_end_p (i); gsi_next (i))
{
gimple gs = gsi_stmt (i);
if (flags & TDF_DETAILS)
Index: gcc/ChangeLog.tuples
===================================================================
--- gcc/ChangeLog.tuples (revision 127279)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog.tuples (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+2007-08-07 Chris Matthews <chrismatthews@google.com>
+
+ * gimple_iterator.h (gsi_start): Changed to produce a pointer instead of
+ struct. Updated clients.
+ (gsi_last): Same.
+ (gsi_end_p): Changed to operate on a pointer instead of struct. Updated
+ clients.
+ (gsi_one_before_end_p): Same.
+ (gsi_next): Same.
+ (gsi_prev): Same.
+ (gsi_stmt): Same.
+
2007-08-07 Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
Merge with mainline @127277.
Index: gcc/gimplify.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/gimplify.c (revision 127279)
+++ gcc/gimplify.c (working copy)
@@ -776,12 +776,12 @@ annotate_one_with_locus (gimple gs, loca
void
annotate_all_with_locus (gimple_seq stmt_p, location_t locus)
{
- gimple_stmt_iterator i;
+ gimple_stmt_iterator *i;
if (gimple_seq_empty_p (stmt_p))
return;
- for (i = gsi_start (stmt_p); !gsi_end_p (i); gsi_next (&i))
+ for (i = gsi_start (stmt_p); !gsi_end_p (i); gsi_next (i))
{
gimple gs = gsi_stmt (i);
annotate_one_with_locus (gs, locus);
Index: gcc/c-common.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/c-common.c (revision 127279)
+++ gcc/c-common.c (working copy)
@@ -6438,9 +6438,9 @@ void
c_warn_unused_result (gimple_seq seq)
{
tree fdecl, ftype;
- gimple_stmt_iterator i;
+ gimple_stmt_iterator *i;
- for (i = gsi_start (seq); !gsi_end_p (i); gsi_next (&i))
+ for (i = gsi_start (seq); !gsi_end_p (i); gsi_next (i))
{
gimple g = gsi_stmt (i);
Index: gcc/gimple.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/gimple.c (revision 127279)
+++ gcc/gimple.c (working copy)
@@ -909,9 +909,9 @@ void
walk_seq_ops (gimple_seq seq, walk_tree_fn func, void *data,
struct pointer_set_t *pset)
{
- gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
+ gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi;
- for (gsi = gsi_start (seq); !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
+ for (gsi = gsi_start (seq); !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (gsi))
walk_tuple_ops (gsi_stmt (gsi), func, data, pset);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-07 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-07 22:33 Christopher Matthews
2007-08-07 22:46 ` Diego Novillo
2007-08-07 22:50 ` Christopher Matthews
2007-08-07 22:56 ` Christopher Matthews
2007-08-07 23:07 ` Christopher Matthews [this message]
2007-08-07 23:11 ` Diego Novillo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5794c4c80708071607k188d5cebx648c367d7e3c4e98@mail.gmail.com \
--to=chrismatthews@google.com \
--cc=aldyh@redhat.com \
--cc=dnovillo@google.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).