From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3784 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2016 10:52:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3765 invoked by uid 89); 10 Oct 2016 10:52:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*UA:Coremail, H*x:Coremail, H*F:D*cn, D*cn X-HELO: pku.edu.cn Received: from mx13.pku.edu.cn (HELO pku.edu.cn) (162.105.129.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:52:00 +0000 Received: by ajax-webmail-mailfront01 (Coremail) ; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 18:51:48 +0800 (GMT+08:00) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:52:00 -0000 X-CM-HeaderCharset: UTF-8 From: "Yuan, Pengfei" To: "Richard Biener" Cc: "Jan Hubicka" , "GCC Patches" Subject: Re: PING: [PATCH] Be more conservative in early inliner if FDO is enabled In-Reply-To: References: <58f49a76.4c20.15712b20e40.Coremail.ypf@pku.edu.cn> <392727ce.b9c7.1572b385ece.Coremail.ypf@pku.edu.cn> <339617a6.8f06.1573166cbaf.Coremail.ypf@pku.edu.cn> <20160916072531.GB69806@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <355e6f53.95d3.1573230b35b.Coremail.ypf@pku.edu.cn> <20160916091417.GA29974@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <6ad18072.d732.15732c834ea.Coremail.ypf@pku.edu.cn> <541a9600.5bf6.157ac66efc7.Coremail.ypf@pku.edu.cn> X-SendMailWithSms: false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <57b16204.6c4b.157ae384f89.Coremail.ypf@pku.edu.cn> X-Coremail-Locale: zh_CN X-CM-TRANSID:x4FpogBXXt7EcvtXDBUZAA--.289W X-CM-SenderInfo: yrsqiiarrtilo6sn3hxhgxhubq/1tbiAgAED1Py7bB6TgACsD X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Ur529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7IcSsGvfJ3iIAIbVAYjsxI4VW5Jw CS07vEb4IE77IF4wCS07vE1I0E4x80FVAKz4kxMIAIbVAFxVCaYxvI4VCIwcAKzIAtYxBI daVFxhVjvjDU= X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00596.txt.bz2 > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Yuan, Pengfei wrote: > > Hi, > > > > What is the decision on this patch? > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01041.html > > Honza approved the patch already. > > Richard. Do I need to sign a copyright assignment for the patch? Moreover, I do not have the permission to commit it. Regards, Yuan, Pengfei