From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 63264 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2016 12:46:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 61397 invoked by uid 89); 14 Sep 2016 12:46:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.156.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:46:20 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id u8EChWGa118760 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:46:19 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com (e35.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.153]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 25eupm0q4x-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:46:19 -0400 Received: from localhost by e35.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:46:18 -0600 Received: from d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.202.179) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:46:14 -0600 X-IBM-Helo: d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: bergner@vnet.ibm.com Received: from b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.17]) by d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B21D19D8062; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:45:44 -0600 (MDT) Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.236]) by b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u8ECkE6C7864734; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:46:14 -0700 Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36217BE039; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:46:14 -0600 (MDT) Received: from otta.local (unknown [9.80.214.126]) by b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC78BE044; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:46:13 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Put a TARGET_LRA_P into every target To: Segher Boessenkool References: <20160914103510.GA24835@gate.crashing.org> Cc: Jeff Law , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Peter Bergner Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:01:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160914103510.GA24835@gate.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16091412-0012-0000-0000-0000109FFC7D X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00005759; HX=3.00000240; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000185; SDB=6.00757593; UDB=6.00359328; IPR=6.00531078; BA=6.00004724; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00012668; XFM=3.00000011; UTC=2016-09-14 12:46:16 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 16091412-0013-0000-0000-0000456FB9F1 Message-Id: <5866b2df-5427-6e27-f44e-97147e190a9f@vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-09-14_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609020000 definitions=main-1609140176 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00813.txt.bz2 On 9/14/16 5:35 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 02:38:54PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> I believe a doc update of some kind is in order. With the doc update >> the entire series is OK. > > Good catch, thanks. My tests finished, all results identical. I'll add > the following patch for the doc update (I hope the wording is strong enough). Maybe s/New ports should use LRA/New ports must use LRA/ ? > + New ports should use LRA, and existing ports are encouraged to convert. ^^ extra space Peter