public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andre Vieira (lists)" <Andre.SimoesDiasVieira@arm.com>
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR78255: Make postreload aware of NO_FUNCTION_CSE
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 10:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <586F772B.50209@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db6385c8-287f-03db-f373-d955b18995fa@redhat.com>

On 09/12/16 16:31, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 12/09/2016 05:16 PM, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> 
>> Regardless, 'reload_cse_simplify' would never perform the opposite
>> transformation.  It checks whether it can replace anything within the
>> first argument INSN, with the second argument TESTREG. As the name
>> implies this will always be a register. I double checked, the function
>> is only called in 'reload_cse_regs' and 'testreg' is created using
>> 'gen_rtx_REG'.
> 
> Ok, let's go ahead with it.
> 
> 
> Bernd
> 
Hello,

Is it OK to backport this (including the testcase fix) to gcc-6-branch?

Patches apply cleanly and full bootstrap and regression tests for
aarch64- and arm-none-linux-gnueabihf. Regression tested for arm-none-eabi.

Cheers,
Andre

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-06 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-09 14:03 Andre Vieira (lists)
2016-12-09 15:02 ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-12-09 15:34   ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2016-12-09 15:58     ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-12-09 16:02       ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2016-12-09 16:16         ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2016-12-09 16:31           ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-12-09 17:22             ` [arm-embedded][committed] " Andre Vieira (lists)
2017-01-06 10:53             ` Andre Vieira (lists) [this message]
2017-01-06 15:47               ` [PATCH] " Jeff Law
2017-01-11 15:09                 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2016-12-12  9:05           ` Christophe Lyon
2016-12-20 16:48             ` [ARM][committed] Fix for PR78255-2.c testism for targets that do not optimize for tailcall Andre Vieira (lists)
2016-12-09 16:01   ` [PATCH] PR78255: Make postreload aware of NO_FUNCTION_CSE Jeff Law
2016-12-09 15:47 Wilco Dijkstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=586F772B.50209@arm.com \
    --to=andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).