From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Fix genmultilib reuse rule checks for large sets of option combinations
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <594f5318-0661-76d5-dcb9-faaf11d8d8c2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706082027370.28164@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
On 06/08/2017 02:28 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> genmultilib computes combination_space, a list of all combinations of
> options in MULTILIB_OPTIONS that might have multilibs built for them
> (some of which may end up not having multilibs built for them, and
> some of those may end up being mapped to other multilibs with
> MULTILIB_REUSE). It is then used to validate the right hand part of
> MULTILIB_REUSE rules, checking with expr that combination_space
> matches a basic regular expression derived from that right hand part.
>
> There are two problems with this approach to validation:
>
> * It requires that right hand part to have options in the same order
> as in MULTILIB_OPTIONS, in contradiction to the documentation of
> MULTILIB_REUSE saying that order does not matter there.
>
> * combination_space can be so large that the expr call fails with an
> E2BIG error. I have a local ARM configuration with 40 multilibs but
> 3840 combinations of options from MULTILIB_OPTIONS (so 3839 listed
> in combination_space, since it doesn't list the default multilib)
> and 996 MULTILIB_REUSE rules. This generates a combination_space
> string longer than the Linux kernel's MAX_ARG_STRLEN (PAGE_SIZE *
> 32, the limit on the length of a single argv string), so that expr
> cannot be run.
>
> This patch changes the validation approach to generate a much shorter
> extended regular expression for any sequence of multilib options in
> any order, and uses that for the validation instead.
>
> Tested with a built for arm-none-eabi --with-multilib-list=aprofile
> (as a configuration that uses MULTILIB_REUSE).
>
> 2017-06-08 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
>
> * genmultilib (combination_space): Remove variable.
> Validate reuse rules against regular expression for any sequence
> of multilib options in any order.
Going to trust you on this :-) regexps are far from my sweet spot.
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-08 20:28 Joseph Myers
2017-06-14 15:09 ` Ping " Joseph Myers
2017-06-27 15:48 ` Ping^2 " Joseph Myers
2017-06-27 16:14 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2017-06-28 8:04 ` Christophe Lyon
2017-06-28 8:09 ` Christophe Lyon
2017-06-28 8:14 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-06-28 9:17 ` Christophe Lyon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=594f5318-0661-76d5-dcb9-faaf11d8d8c2@redhat.com \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).