public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com>
To: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>,
	 "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch, ARM, testsuite] Add -mfloat-abi=hard to arm_neon_ok
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5950D031.60500@foss.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKdteOYUCUB8dhtUF5SX-NEBRvWNWxX13jDQaLZG1m7+czbpJA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Christophe,

On 07/06/17 10:13, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 2 June 2017 at 16:19, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have recently updated the dejagnu version I use for
>> cross-testing arm and aarch64 toolchains to 1.6+. One of the side
>> effects was mentioned by Jonathan in
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg01267.html. Since I
>> use multilibs to test many configurations, I noticed several
>> changes in the results I get.
>>
>> In particular, on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf with -march=armv5t,
>> all the tests that require arm_neon_ok fail to compile because
>> they now use -march=armv5t -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp
>> -march=armv7-a, which leads to a failure to include
>> gnu/stubs-soft.h (not present since the target is
>> 'hf'). Previously, -march=armv5t was appended, making the tests
>> unsupported because -mfpu=neon conflicts with -march=armv5t. Now,
>> arm_neon_ok succeeds because it only checks if some preprocessor
>> defines are present.
>>
>> This patch fixes that by including arm_neon.h in arm_neon_ok, such
>> that it fails for unsupported cases. However, since most of these
>> tests should pass instead of becoming unsupported, I have added flag
>> combinations with -mfloat-abi=hard.
>>
>> However, this is not sufficient to make the
>> gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837* tests pass: they do not require
>> arm_neon_ok, and when I tried to add it, they still failed
>> because these lto tests do not support dg-add-options. My
>> proposal is to add a new
>> check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi function which
>> tries to use neon without trying to change the -mfloat-abi
>> setting (that is, the same as arm_neon_ok, with only ""
>> and "-mfpu=neon" in the list of flags) . This makes these two lto
>> tests unsupported for non-hf targets (again because
>> gnu/stubs-soft.h is not present).
>>
>> To make them pass on "hf" targets:
>> - I added -mfpu=neon to dg-lto-options in pr65837-attr_0.c,
>>    because the fpu attributes in arm_neon.h only work if
>>    -mfpu=neon is enabled
>> - I removed dg-suppress-ld-options {-mfpu=neon} from pr65837_0.c,
>>    -mfpu=neon is needed for the test to compile with toolchains
>>    where the default fpu is not neon (eg vfpv3-d16-fp16)
>>
>> On arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=vfp
>> and multilib test flag=-march=armv5t, this patch brings:
>> - 2 UNRESOLVED -> FAIL (gcc.dg/vect/vect-align-1.c)
>> - 14 UNRESOLVED -> XPASS (in gcc.dg/vect/)
>> - 2765 new PASS
>> - 3639 FAIL -> PASS
>> - 1826 UNRESOLVED -> PASS
>> - 102 UNRESOLVED -> XFAIL
>>
>> as visible in the red cell at
>> http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-validation/gcc-test-patches/248552-gnu-stubs9.patch/report-build-info.html
>> (the build-failed line can be ignored, it was caused by a server
>> problem)
>>
>> Sorry, the explanation is almost longer than the patch :-)
>>
>> Is it OK for trunk?
>> (Just realizing that I forgot to document the new functions :( )
>>
> Here is an updated version with a bit of documentation for the new
> effective target.
> arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi now only tries to add -mfpu=neon, not ""
> since we always
> add -mfpu=neon in the lto tests anyway.
>
> OK?
>

This is ok.
Sorry for the delay.

Kyrill

>> Thanks,
>>
>> Christophe

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-26  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-02 14:19 Christophe Lyon
2017-06-07  9:13 ` Christophe Lyon
2017-06-16 15:39   ` Christophe Lyon
2017-06-26  7:34     ` Christophe Lyon
2017-06-26  9:13   ` Kyrill Tkachov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5950D031.60500@foss.arm.com \
    --to=kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.lyon@linaro.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).