* [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for case pr42894.c
@ 2011-08-25 12:35 Terry Guo
2011-09-09 9:17 ` Richard Earnshaw
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Terry Guo @ 2011-08-25 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
Hello,
I think it is useful to run this case for newer arm targets. So the patch
intends to skip the warning of architecture conflicts. Is it ok to commit to
trunk?
BR,
Terry
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2011-08-25 Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com>
* gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c: Add dg-prune-output to skip
architecture conflict.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
index c3bd76c..cda6719 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-march=armv5te -mthumb" { target arm*-*-* } } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target tls } */
+/* { dg-prune-output "switch .* conflicts with" } */
extern __thread int t;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for case pr42894.c
2011-08-25 12:35 [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for case pr42894.c Terry Guo
@ 2011-09-09 9:17 ` Richard Earnshaw
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Earnshaw @ 2011-09-09 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Terry Guo; +Cc: gcc-patches
Ok.
R.
On 25 Aug 2011, at 12:45, "Terry Guo" <terry.guo@arm.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think it is useful to run this case for newer arm targets. So the patch
> intends to skip the warning of architecture conflicts. Is it ok to commit to
> trunk?
>
> BR,
> Terry
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2011-08-25 Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com>
>
> * gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c: Add dg-prune-output to skip
> architecture conflict.
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> index c3bd76c..cda6719 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-options "-march=armv5te -mthumb" { target arm*-*-* } } */
> /* { dg-require-effective-target tls } */
> +/* { dg-prune-output "switch .* conflicts with" } */
>
> extern __thread int t;
>
>
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for case pr42894.c
@ 2011-09-09 5:14 Terry Guo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Terry Guo @ 2011-09-09 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Jakub Jelinek'; +Cc: gcc-patches
Hello,
Is it ok to commit?
BR,
Terry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry.guo@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 9:40 AM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for
> case pr42894.c
>
> Ping.
>
> BR,
> Terry
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry.guo@arm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 7:46 PM
> > To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> > Subject: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for
> > case pr42894.c
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I think it is useful to run this case for newer arm targets. So the
> > patch intends to skip the warning of architecture conflicts. Is it ok
> > to commit to trunk?
> >
> > BR,
> > Terry
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2011-08-25 Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com>
> >
> > * gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c: Add dg-prune-output to skip
> > architecture conflict.
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> > index c3bd76c..cda6719 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> > /* { dg-do compile } */
> > /* { dg-options "-march=armv5te -mthumb" { target arm*-*-* } } */
> > /* { dg-require-effective-target tls } */
> > +/* { dg-prune-output "switch .* conflicts with" } */
> >
> > extern __thread int t;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for case pr42894.c
@ 2011-08-30 9:12 Terry Guo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Terry Guo @ 2011-08-30 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
Ping.
BR,
Terry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry.guo@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 7:46 PM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for
> case pr42894.c
>
> Hello,
>
> I think it is useful to run this case for newer arm targets. So the
> patch intends to skip the warning of architecture conflicts. Is it ok
> to commit to trunk?
>
> BR,
> Terry
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2011-08-25 Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com>
>
> * gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c: Add dg-prune-output to skip
> architecture conflict.
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> index c3bd76c..cda6719 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-options "-march=armv5te -mthumb" { target arm*-*-* } } */
> /* { dg-require-effective-target tls } */
> +/* { dg-prune-output "switch .* conflicts with" } */
>
> extern __thread int t;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-09 8:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-25 12:35 [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for case pr42894.c Terry Guo
2011-09-09 9:17 ` Richard Earnshaw
2011-08-30 9:12 Terry Guo
2011-09-09 5:14 Terry Guo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).