From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3324 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2018 15:14:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3314 invoked by uid 89); 2 Feb 2018 15:14:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: foss.arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.101.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 15:14:43 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E085780D; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 07:14:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.2.207.77] (e100706-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.2.207.77]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE5643F24D; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 07:14:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5A74805F.6040901@foss.arm.com> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 15:14:00 -0000 From: Kyrill Tkachov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joseph Myers CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Richard Earnshaw , James Greenhalgh , Marcus Shawcroft Subject: Re: Avoid assembler warnings from AArch64 constructor/destructor priorities References: <5A734267.5000505@foss.arm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-02/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 On 01/02/18 17:26, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2018, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > >> Hi Joseph, aarch64 maintainers, >> >> On 28/09/17 13:31, Joseph Myers wrote: >>> Many GCC tests fail for AArch64 with current binutils because of >>> assembler warnings of the form "Warning: ignoring incorrect section >>> type for .init_array.00100". The same issue was fixed for ARM in >>> r247015 by using SECTION_NOTYPE when creating those sections; this >>> patch applies the same fix to AArch64. >>> >>> Tested with no regressions with cross to aarch64-linux-gnu. OK to >>> commit? >> There is a user request to backport this patch to the GCC 7 and 6 >> branches: PR 84168. >> >> Would that be acceptable? > I don't object, but I'm not aware of this being a regression. I think it's been present since the beginning of the port so it's not a regression, just a user request for a bugfix backport. The patch applies, bootstraps and tests cleanly on both branches FWIW. Thanks, Kyrill