From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30693 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2012 02:59:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 30685 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2012 02:59:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:59:11 +0000 Received: from omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.11]) by qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id U2jz1j0090EZKEL512zBFl; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:59:11 +0000 Received: from bag6-1-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net ([IPv6:2001:470:1f04:ae1::2]) by omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id U2zB1j00A0P3DwE3M2zCq1; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:59:13 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <20120629001525.GA8768@mx.loc> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 05:43:00 -0000 Cc: Janis Johnson , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5B5DC7FC-E0DC-41AE-9D27-E0F2114FB213@comcast.net> References: <20120313163858.GB29875@mx.loc> <3D0569AE-048B-40F9-B916-523B32670B6B@comcast.net> <20120315123954.GA27018@mx.loc> <20120315165632.GC24587@mx.loc> <20120315193547.GC16117@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20120316100445.GA30354@mx.loc> <20120316145958.GA19127@mx.loc> <20120628222713.GA5885@mx.loc> <8FD23DF4-DDFB-484A-88D8-82EE7F838AE1@comcast.net> <20120629001525.GA8768@mx.loc> To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg01904.txt.bz2 On Jun 28, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 04:43:05PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote: >> On Jun 28, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >>> Perhaps you want to pursue this? We'd need to suggest this to dejagnu, >>=20 >> Actually, we have the technology, so that isn't necessary. :-) You can= install replacements for any procs you want, not pretty, but... it does wo= rk. I think this is a more deterministic path forward than waiting for a m= ythical dejagnu release. Also, we then can avoid the hassle of requiring a= new dejagnu. >=20 > Wouldn't that mean that we have to completely replace proc load_lib? Yes; worse, it is a cut-n-paste from dejagnu and can effectively rev lock u= s to the current dejagnu release... One can delegate, but I don't think an= y pre or post processing in this case is enough to `fix' the issue, so it w= ould be a wholesale replacement. > But anyway. > Mike, it would be nice if you could fix >> +# BUG: gcc-dg calls gcc-set-multilib-library-path but does not load gcc= -defs! Sounds like a single line fix. It is the testing of that fix that is the a= nnoying part.