public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
	Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	Nick Alcock via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch][version 6] add -ftrivial-auto-var-init and variable attribute "uninitialized" to gcc
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:53:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5BAB8849-A075-48A5-BC1B-0FA26C508695@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202107281222.BF0BB3D8B6@keescook>

Hi, Kees,

Thanks a lot for your testing and the small testing case.

I just studied the root cause of this bug, and found that it’s because the call to “__builtin_clear_padding()” should NOT be inserted BEFORE
the variable initialization. It should be inserted AFTER the variable initialization. 

Currently since the call to “__builtin_clear_padding()” is inserted Before the variable initialization like the following:

      __builtin_clear_padding (&obj, 0B, 1);
      obj = {};
      obj.val = val;

Then as a result, the reference to “obj” in the call to “__builtin_clear_padding” is considered as an uninitialized usage.  
I will move the call to __builtin_clear_padding after the variable initialization. 

Thanks.

Qing

> On Jul 28, 2021, at 3:21 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 03:26:00AM +0000, Qing Zhao wrote:
>> This is the 6th version of the patch for the new security feature for GCC.
>> 
>> I have tested it with bootstrap on both x86 and aarch64, regression testing on both x86 and aarch64.
>> Also compile CPU2017 (running is ongoing), without any issue. (With the fix to bug https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101586).
>> 
>> Please take a look and let me know any issue.
> 
> Good news, this passes all my initialization tests in the kernel. Yay! :)
> 
> However, I see an unexpected side-effect from some static initializations:
> 
> net/core/sock.c: In function 'sock_no_sendpage':
> net/core/sock.c:2849:23: warning: 'msg' is used uninitialized [-Wuninitialized]
> 2849 |         struct msghdr msg = {.msg_flags = flags};
>      |                       ^~~           
> 
> It seems like -Wuninitialized has suddenly stopped noticing explicit
> static initializers when there are bit fields in the struct. Here's a
> minimized case:
> 
> $ cat init.c
> struct weird {
>        int bit : 1;
>        int val;
> };
> 
> int func(int val)
> {
>        struct weird obj = { .val = val };
>        return obj.val;
> }
> 
> $ gcc -c -o init.o -Wall -O2 -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero init.c
> init.c: In function ‘func’:
> init.c:8:22: warning: ‘obj’ is used uninitialized [-Wuninitialized]
>    8 |         struct weird obj = { .val = val };
>      |                      ^~~
> init.c:8:22: note: ‘obj’ declared here
>    8 |         struct weird obj = { .val = val };
>      |                      ^~~
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Kees Cook


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-28 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-27  3:26 Qing Zhao
2021-07-28 20:21 ` Kees Cook
2021-07-28 21:53   ` Qing Zhao [this message]
2021-08-09 14:09 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-09 16:38   ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-09 17:14     ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10  7:36     ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 13:39       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 14:16         ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 15:02           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 15:22             ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 15:55               ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 20:16               ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 22:26                 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11  7:02                   ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 13:33                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 13:37                       ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 13:54                         ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 13:58                           ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 14:00                             ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 15:30                             ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 15:53                               ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 16:22                                 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 16:55                                   ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 16:57                                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 20:30                                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 22:03                                       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16  7:12                                         ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 14:48                                           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 15:08                                             ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 15:39                                               ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16  7:11                                       ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 16:48                                         ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 15:04                                           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 20:40                                             ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-18  7:19                                               ` Richard Biener
2021-08-18 14:39                                                 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11  9:02                   ` Richard Sandiford
2021-08-11 13:44                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 16:15                       ` Richard Sandiford
2021-08-11 16:29                         ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-12 19:24   ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-12 22:45     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16  7:40     ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 15:45       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17  8:29         ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:50           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 16:08             ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-18  7:15               ` Richard Biener
2021-08-18 16:02                 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-19  9:00                   ` Richard Biener
2021-08-19 13:54                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-20 14:52                       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-23 13:55                       ` Richard Biener
2021-09-02 17:24                         ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 19:49       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17  8:43         ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:03           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 14:45             ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:53               ` Qing Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5BAB8849-A075-48A5-BC1B-0FA26C508695@oracle.com \
    --to=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=mjambor@suse.cz \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).