public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: Xiongchuan Tan <xc-tan@outlook.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: fantasquex@gmail.com, andrew@sifive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Libitm add RISC-V support.
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 17:05:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ac3d38a-27c1-cc4a-dc4b-9d82e109503a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OSYP286MB0261ABB716605DE32EC2C58B91339@OSYP286MB0261.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>


On 10/27/22 06:49, Xiongchuan Tan via Gcc-patches wrote:
> libitm/ChangeLog:
>
>          * configure.tgt: Add riscv support.
>          * config/riscv/asm.h: New file.
>          * config/riscv/sjlj.S: New file.
>          * config/riscv/target.h: New file.
> ---
> v2: Change HW_CACHELINE_SIZE to 64 (in accordance with the RVA profiles, see
> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/main/profiles.adoc)
>
>   libitm/config/riscv/asm.h    |  52 +++++++++++++
>   libitm/config/riscv/sjlj.S   | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   libitm/config/riscv/target.h |  50 ++++++++++++
>   libitm/configure.tgt         |   2 +
>   4 files changed, 248 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 libitm/config/riscv/asm.h
>   create mode 100644 libitm/config/riscv/sjlj.S
>   create mode 100644 libitm/config/riscv/target.h

Not objecting or even reviewing....  But hasn't transactional memory 
largely fallen out of favor these days?  Intel has pulled it and I think 
IBM did as well.    Should we be investing in extending libitm at all?


jeff



  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-27 23:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-27 12:49 Xiongchuan Tan
2022-10-27 23:05 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2022-10-28  0:44   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-28  4:23     ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-10-29  3:18       ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5ac3d38a-27c1-cc4a-dc4b-9d82e109503a@gmail.com \
    --to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@sifive.com \
    --cc=fantasquex@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=xc-tan@outlook.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).