From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AE6A385BF9C for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:36:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8AE6A385BF9C Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1B1GGZOT032730; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:36:24 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3cpce70eh7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:36:24 +0000 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 1B1GWVg7007557; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:36:24 GMT Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3cpce70egp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:36:23 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1B1GTdiW004922; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:36:22 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.24]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3ckcabrnjt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:36:22 +0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 1B1GaLBb65929596 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:36:21 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3A511206F; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:36:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC975112065; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:36:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.211.97.109] (unknown [9.211.97.109]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:36:20 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <5d0f6e1e-1cb8-948c-f833-be2e94ac7610@linux.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 10:36:19 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Reply-To: wschmidt@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH, PING] rs6000: Builtins test changes for pragma_misc9.c From: Bill Schmidt To: GCC Patches Cc: Segher Boessenkool , David Edelsohn References: <2ba31ed8-7403-5f23-dbbb-c8d4924b1872@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <2ba31ed8-7403-5f23-dbbb-c8d4924b1872@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Of-aLZPQA_h80EAE_RRSDPKBIMI0sePJ X-Proofpoint-GUID: tyMo6qOn1n8E2hxkO8zMSN2rWwWTN5qq X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-11-30_10,2021-12-01_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2110150000 definitions=main-2112010090 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:36:28 -0000 Hi!  I'd like to ping this patch. Thanks! Bill On 11/18/21 10:18 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote: > Hi! This patch is broken out from the test suite patch for the new > builtins support. This one is just a minor adjustment for the error > message wording. > > Tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and powerpc64-linux-gnu (-m32/-m64) > with no regressions. Is this okay for trunk? > > Thanks! > Bill > > > 2021-11-17 Bill Schmidt > > gcc/testsuite/ > * gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c: Adjust error message. > --- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c > index e03099bd084..c1667d9f7db 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ vector bool int > test2 (vector signed int a, vector signed int b) > { > return vec_cmpnez (a, b); > - /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vcmpnezw' requires the '-mcpu=power9' option" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */ > + /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vcmpnezw' requires the '-mcpu=power9' and '-mvsx' options" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */ > } > > #pragma GCC target ("cpu=power7") > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ vector signed int > test3 (vector signed int a, vector signed int b) > { > return vec_mergee (a, b); > - /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vmrgew_v4si' requires the '-mpower8-vector' option" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */ > + /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vmrgew_v4si' requires the '-mcpu=power8' and '-mvsx' options" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */ > } > > #pragma GCC target ("cpu=power6")