From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88AA03858D35 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 20:01:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 88AA03858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id 71-20020a17090a09cd00b00218adeb3549so6867581pjo.1 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:01:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lhaU7mpyLlDvAkId/7CG8KrtCUE5q58HqvtYhYnFe4o=; b=BfsBrW/auFIQB11cTWLuAwuR2ajQvZG6nHyqQroWK47z2QdpStCaLF5tthWsmJue16 m5UFTxyJ/qIG7ZdB52MlkeFlVwrEzwmg2p+uxxLE0LOYdmm1j1WPmEYOR7GirbvjFbvi RyCl4LtsujagPsAQMqIF6NRZgdFBgi/21P1PL/vooTQW3iUuVdLrtNM19ROExVheYasd Rr5NNQTMdkn7uHu3hJPIACCBAL5nt9H9HgWYIvba4QA/nboE0f9LVr/nEMabCIaF11rI iNkEjPgA1ut1+EYgf8wO58rh/d3O6ovyNvVzIP7o3S9DyNKNU16LSQr4BOzw/VYei4H9 ubSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lhaU7mpyLlDvAkId/7CG8KrtCUE5q58HqvtYhYnFe4o=; b=JW5/6V+bXNNRPG//gi4KuL2l/DVcvaP12FVKNhKlbSNcuB4Ka2W3ImeDkI/WdZ15Qs GivpiCKtMN5r4cc1cvxMZcafAseNTdEC43PuBdAv1tH2zg4pw7XEbq0P6S1oadhVkl32 I6/tJRAZNotZXN+dyDG0D+jtudf3OMC/aQcb9G/DoYRsMQsewXw0UA8VEdpeLpxeWZKf 7ufLKCKNyzcrcscPDSEaZYXDWnPMdLOjTpABMgkzMBdGqlmYY5IR11TyVsXuM3NIJ4+t DpX+HDEyYuw+4MYREOu6zlfVzGkCj9bge4okZ2hVczWbAy6Z3LSxy/UNIcH2DKQ2+iOU wwAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkak04L1jKNYyeF0tPCC6Pf1BG+Pmyh6jkVCnmG0oaQxO28uE88 wMtGHVZOr3C0P5YaAUBf9yA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6ZDqZcsluzWe3zTKSloPzrZINRB46hLMwLOblwRQnwVEcyCgI/+kQc0SPPtt2f2R40vNjq+A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d68b:b0:188:cca8:df29 with SMTP id v11-20020a170902d68b00b00188cca8df29mr11466144ply.148.1669147269299; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:01:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2601:681:8600:13d0::99f? ([2601:681:8600:13d0::99f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c14-20020a624e0e000000b0056bd6b14144sm11022724pfb.180.2022.11.22.12.01.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:01:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5d17b0fc-e7b3-c00d-4a5b-6af78836b2b6@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:01:07 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix autoprofiledbootstrap build Content-Language: en-US To: Eugene Rozenfeld , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Andi Kleen References: From: Jeff Law In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 11/21/22 14:57, Eugene Rozenfeld via Gcc-patches wrote: > 1. Fix gcov version > 2. Don't attempt to create an autoprofile file for cc1 since cc1plus > (not cc1) is not invoked when building cc1 > 3. Fix documentation typo > > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * c/Make-lang.in: Don't attempt to create an autoprofile file for cc1 > * cp/Make-lang.in: Fix gcov version > * lto/Make-lang.in: Fix gcov version > * doc/install.texi: Fix documentation typo Just to be 100% sure.  While the compiler is built with cc1plus, various runtime libraries are still build with the C compiler and thus would use cc1.  AFAICT it looks like we don't try to build the runtime libraries to get any data about the behavior of the C compiler.  Can you confirm? Assuming that's correct, this is fine for the trunk. Thanks, Jeff