From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from loongson.cn (mail.loongson.cn [114.242.206.163]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34ED53858410 for ; Sat, 6 May 2023 23:34:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 34ED53858410 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loongson.cn Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=loongson.cn Received: from loongson.cn (unknown [223.72.68.87]) by gateway (Coremail) with SMTP id _____8CxuOkG5FZk5_EFAA--.9789S3; Sun, 07 May 2023 07:34:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from [192.168.2.109] (unknown [223.72.68.87]) by localhost.localdomain (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf8BxKL0D5FZkbFtOAA--.11457S3; Sun, 07 May 2023 07:34:28 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Enable shrink wrapping To: Xi Ruoyao , WANG Xuerui , Guo Jie , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Chenghua Xu References: <20230423131903.155998-1-xry111@xry111.site> <182bca4f-c605-8e0c-19ce-e840258b05d2@loongson.cn> <06776d684166d7f4588e72d52cfb5da34262bdeb.camel@xry111.site> From: chenglulu Message-ID: <5d1e3eb1-b644-547b-393b-49188fb39447@loongson.cn> Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 07:34:27 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux loongarch64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <06776d684166d7f4588e72d52cfb5da34262bdeb.camel@xry111.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-CM-TRANSID:AQAAf8BxKL0D5FZkbFtOAA--.11457S3 X-CM-SenderInfo: xfkh0wpoxo3qxorr0wxvrqhubq/ X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uk129KBjvJXoW7ur4ktFyDZw18Xr1DAr4fXwb_yoW8GFWDpa ySkFyYkFWDAF4kCw40yr10va4IyrW3trWUXrykK3srZws0va4rtr47tr4Y9FsrKrsaga4Y vw40va1fAryqya7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUj1kv1TuYvTs0mT0YCTnIWj qI5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfYxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUU bx8YFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s 1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xv wVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwA2z4 x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwAS0I0E 0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc804VCY07AIYIkI8VC2zVCFFI0UMc02F40EFcxC0VAKzV Aqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S 6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcVAKI48JMxk0xIA0c2IEe2xFo4CEbIxvr21l42xK82 IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC2 0s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMI IF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF 0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87 Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07UE-erUUUUU= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: 在 2023/5/7 上午1:07, Xi Ruoyao 写道: > On Wed, 2023-04-26 at 18:21 +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote: >> On 2023/4/26 18:14, Lulu Cheng wrote: >>> 在 2023/4/26 下午6:02, WANG Xuerui 写道: >>>> On 2023/4/26 17:53, Lulu Cheng wrote: >>>>> Hi, ruoyao: >>>>> >>>>>       The performance of spec2006 is finished. The fixed-point >>>>> 400.perlbench has about 3% performance improvement, >>>>> >>>>> and the other basics have not changed, and the floating-point tests >>>>> have basically remained the same. >>>> Nice to know! >>>>>       Do you have any questions about the test cases mentioned by >>>>> Guo Jie? If there is no problem, modify the test case, >>>>> >>>>> I think the code can be merged into the main branch. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> BTW what about the previous function/loop alignment patch.es? The LLVM >>>> changes are also waiting for such results. ;-) >>> Well, there are many combinations in this align test, so the test time >>> will be very long. I will reply the result as soon as the test results >>> come out.:-) >>> >> Oh, I got. Thanks very much for all the tests and take your time! > Sorry if it's noisy, but I hope there is some (maybe preliminary) > result: now I finally have some spare time to rebuild the system with > GCC 13 and I'd like to use some -falign-functions= in my CFLAGS :). > The test is still ongoing, and I will reply to the results by email after the test is completed.:-)