From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 111942 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2019 14:16:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111933 invoked by uid 89); 11 Feb 2019 14:16:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,GARBLED_BODY,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HAuthentication-Results:auth, =d0=b8=d0=bb=d1, =d0=b7=d0=be=d0=b2, contributions?= X-HELO: mail.aegee.org Received: from mail.aegee.org (HELO mail.aegee.org) (144.76.142.78) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:16:43 +0000 Authentication-Results: mail.aegee.org/x1BEGREk021092; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=didopalauzov DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=aegee.org; s=k4096; t=1549894591; i=dkim+MSA-tls@aegee.org; r=y; bh=u5nLRcTdJZj0vjjWTjbTytEACCaIAdLtHmmFkBL18ng=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=ZZXGATTiQqBzaGiDNXYUc61j/IXVTIEEfMM/W5E8jCZ3RbCDk2EWzwuvm4FgDM+CH 8Itw5JC9DMuOvMRHKW02zGigLW2nrjxLa/hG6eY5coIok9YTStUE/L0AkbqOI0tGGe P/XPCeP+NWoIdtsyStexTAMDjMRZJyxDAmSX7RHx927cKgD+ysKeGaaITn4TJSIvoe pDmBe0P/ErqkrIN/1a58fndTmFxQ9t+G3H0/JiRXPt4Q+kVQrlyfGjcVvy09p4FjLm fXUTXxqMUOA8WHWwrgLkVEig5MkMAv7O/8LMpK40cKr7onvdDPmv7H45V4FvW7vxMb rpj5x1z6EA+ppOiFs1p2XE9rPlzhUrJn0D32tBxQIFQ9vAyCNbgtKxi0d5GRPvwiy2 0//LNYKIuZKwv58Gu3l6u8w8oYbvHjtJCsp8SBRoJAno/o+FfUrLPDDTU/ILY/E9PV O8i+ofSz8s+DByhFfF1CO8Q267VxmviNbOcK8ZawFc3nHQYyCA8uV02uP/wwKw3Yej sXFwQY+/o1g1w+il6tDVCS2ZuXZZ/5UoBPwSI3wN0YGCVShptiT+fW3tFFehgJZoFC eZSEfcPt4D1f0D9ufP2FEy8KAhDmVz2i4MkK1aG+kxYUbueebE3iGL/eG958ZXiulh 63b6G6js3r7FagpXlUP/m6Tw= Authentication-Results: mail.aegee.org/x1BEGREk021092; dkim=none Received: from Tylan (dslb-088-066-133-073.088.066.pools.vodafone-ip.de [88.66.133.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.aegee.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1BEGREk021092 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:16:27 GMT Message-ID: <5da63d0daa0f4b086f07d48a5e82240bb9a8f425.camel@aegee.org> Subject: Re: Make clear, when contributions will be ignored From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=94=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=BD_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2?= To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: Joseph Myers , gcc-patches Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20190211135742.GO14180@gate.crashing.org> References: <25a0e5620b1e8a7a831ae9660c988f5dd98aa7dd.camel@aegee.org> <20181205171121.GQ3803@gate.crashing.org> <0990b8acd4cc08f74c1bf314851a113711dbfa04.camel@aegee.org> <20190206124401.GO14180@gate.crashing.org> <20190210205616.GJ14180@gate.crashing.org> <120af439a98fc4160e684fca11fc63715e20ca93.camel@aegee.org> <20190211135742.GO14180@gate.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.31.91 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-02/txt/msg00761.txt.bz2 Hello Segher, my question was how do you propose to proceed, so that a no-reminders-for-patches-are-necessary-state is reached. There is no relation with having infinite time or dealing with high-cost low-profit patches. Previously I raised the quesion, whether automating the process for sending reminders, is a good idea. This saves time of people to write reminders. Greetings Дилян On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 07:57 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:44:31PM +0000, Дилян Палаузов wrote: > > -- at https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/contribute.html is written “If you do not receive a response to a patch that you > > have submitted within two weeks or so, it may be a good idea to chase it by sending a follow-up email to the same > > list(s).” > > That is about patches. Not about bugzilla. Sending reminders for bugzilla > reports is useless and annoying. Sending reminders for patches however is > necessary, the way our development works currently. It isn't clear any > change to procedures would help at all, since the fundamental problems need > to be attacked to make any progress. Maintainers do not have infinite time, > and there is no incentive to deal with high-cost low-profit patches. > > > Segher