From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E8A03858410 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:20:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1E8A03858410 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19EDe8jm013489; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 10:20:44 -0400 Received: from ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (6b.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.107]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bnrnwj90d-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 10:20:43 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19EEHnOO006680; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:20:42 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bk2qak9an-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:20:42 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 19EEF2d757278760 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:15:02 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D0AA4075; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:20:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E53A406F; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:20:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-926bd7cc-2dd1-11b2-a85c-f6adc0f5efec.ibm.com (unknown [9.171.89.112]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:20:38 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ifcvt: Check if cmovs are needed. To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, richard.sandiford@arm.com References: <20210625160905.23786-1-rdapp@linux.ibm.com> <20210625160905.23786-2-rdapp@linux.ibm.com> <399e9ada-8a0a-e95b-f037-b3f3cb8a6c48@linux.ibm.com> From: Robin Dapp Message-ID: <5ddba534-293b-6d24-0543-4d0c601a5458@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 16:20:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: YGzws321jv_foztSX2dRJqHTZJjLN4lz X-Proofpoint-GUID: YGzws321jv_foztSX2dRJqHTZJjLN4lz X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-14_08,2021-10-14_02,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=849 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110140088 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:20:48 -0000 Hi Richard, > (2) Insert: > > if (SUBREG_P (src)) > src = SUBREG_REG (src); > > here. > > OK with those changes if that works. Let me know if they don't — > I'll try to be quicker with the next review. thank you, this looks good in a first testsuite run on s390. If you have time, would you mind looking at the other outstanding patches of this series as well? In case of further comments, which I am sure there will be, I could test them all at once afterwards. Thanks again Robin