From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A6213858C83 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:03:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 9A6213858C83 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F45233E53; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 07:03:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from naga (ip-109-43-113-252.web.vodafone.de [109.43.113.252]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0D3833E8A; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 07:03:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:03:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Tobias Burnus cc: gcc-patches , Tom de Vries , Thomas Schwinge Subject: Re: [wwwdocs][patch] gcc-13/changes.html: Add nvptx's --with-arch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <5ec1a14c-9436-b155-3699-d785b0f83152@pfeifer.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09 on 209.68.5.143 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Tobias, On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Tobias Burnus wrote: > The attached patch documents the new nvptx configure flag > --with-arch=sm_... > > Comments? OK? where it reads + + --with-arch= flag; if not specified, GCC defaults to + sm_30. GCC's target libraries are build both with + sm_30 and the specified target architecture. I suggest "configure option" instead of "flag" (if that's it, of course). And I'd start the following as a full sentence "If not specified", or in fact omit it, since "GCC defaults" already implies "If not specified"? "are build" -> "are then built", and switch the last two sentences? Okay with those changes (or telling me I'm wrong ;-). Gerald