From: dhumieres.dominique@free.fr
To: Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>
Cc: "José Rui Faustino de Sousa" <jrfsousa@gmail.com>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100120/100816/100818/100819/100821 problems raised by aggregate data types
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 14:40:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f4f1316758e46a67181ad1d5951003e@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGkQGiKM_UC7=LVSh4SX8t8accKMPiRaJC4J_ynH_W8P=-JB=w@mail.gmail.com>
Since the PRs are about wrong code, I think the patch should be back
ported to at least GCC11.
Dominique
Le 2021-06-04 17:24, Paul Richard Thomas a écrit :
> Hi José,
>
> I can second Dominique's thanks. I applied it to my tree when you
> first posted, set the regtest in motion and have not been able to
> return to gfortran matters since.
>
> OK for master.
>
> I am especially happy that you have tackled this area and have
> rationalised it to a substantial degree. The wheel keeps being
> re-invented by different people, largely for a lack of documentation
> or coherent self-documentation. I know, as one of the guilty ones.
>
> Regards
>
> Paul
>
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 16:05, dhumieres.dominique--- via Fortran
> <fortran@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi José,
>>
>>> Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>>
>> Also tested on darwin20. The patch is OK for me.
>>
>> Thanks for the work,
>>
>> Dominique
>
> --
> "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
> - Albert Einstein
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-05 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-03 15:04 dhumieres.dominique
2021-06-04 15:24 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2021-06-05 12:40 ` dhumieres.dominique [this message]
2021-06-06 17:58 ` Re:[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling dhumieres.dominique
2021-06-19 10:57 ` [Patch, fortran v2] " dhumieres.dominique
2021-06-19 11:00 ` [Patch, fortran V3] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid dhumieres.dominique
2021-06-23 14:20 ` [Patch, fortran V3] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid (list of pending patches) dhumieres.dominique
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-05-28 23:49 [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100120/100816/100818/100819/100821 problems raised by aggregate data types José Rui Faustino de Sousa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5f4f1316758e46a67181ad1d5951003e@free.fr \
--to=dhumieres.dominique@free.fr \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jrfsousa@gmail.com \
--cc=paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).