From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBC9F385042B; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 12:40:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org EBC9F385042B Received: from webmail.free.fr (unknown [172.20.243.6]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CD420039F; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 14:40:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 2a01:e0a:8e0:4370:3094:a9cd:d5b5:f16e by webmail.free.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 14:40:52 +0200 From: dhumieres.dominique@free.fr To: Paul Richard Thomas Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Jos=C3=A9_Rui_Faustino_de_Sousa?= , gcc-patches , fortran@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100120/100816/100818/100819/100821 problems raised by aggregate data types In-Reply-To: References: <0b58905bce20c64b46e9350aaecffe08@free.fr> Message-ID: <5f4f1316758e46a67181ad1d5951003e@free.fr> X-Sender: dhumieres.dominique@free.fr User-Agent: Webmail Free/1.3.3 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 12:41:04 -0000 Since the PRs are about wrong code, I think the patch should be back ported to at least GCC11. Dominique Le 2021-06-04 17:24, Paul Richard Thomas a écrit : > Hi José, > > I can second Dominique's thanks. I applied it to my tree when you > first posted, set the regtest in motion and have not been able to > return to gfortran matters since. > > OK for master. > > I am especially happy that you have tackled this area and have > rationalised it to a substantial degree. The wheel keeps being > re-invented by different people, largely for a lack of documentation > or coherent self-documentation. I know, as one of the guilty ones. > > Regards > > Paul > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 16:05, dhumieres.dominique--- via Fortran > wrote: > >> Hi José, >> >>> Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. >> >> Also tested on darwin20. The patch is OK for me. >> >> Thanks for the work, >> >> Dominique > > -- > "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" > - Albert Einstein