From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 71550 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2017 17:32:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 71535 invoked by uid 89); 10 Feb 2017 17:32:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=itching X-HELO: sasl.smtp.pobox.com Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (HELO sasl.smtp.pobox.com) (64.147.108.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:31:53 +0000 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E2167E2A; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:31:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606EC67E29; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:31:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (unknown [76.215.41.237]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72A2F67E27; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:31:49 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH v3 0/8] [i386] Use out-of-line stubs for ms_abi pro/epilogues To: Uros Bizjak References: <2fd14fe7-8d06-45ab-fb1e-96c9c8f4c03b@pobox.com> Cc: gcc-patches , Jan Hubicka , Sandra Loosemore , 10walls@gmail.com From: Daniel Santos Message-ID: <6008288a-1636-c9f5-13ee-008f30b43fee@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:55:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CDDB4D7A-EFB6-11E6-965F-FE3F13518317-06139138!pb-smtp1.pobox.com X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00730.txt.bz2 On 02/10/2017 04:32 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Daniel Santos wrote: > > You will need a sign-off from cygwin od mingw-w64 maintainer (CC'd). > While I can review the patch in the sense that it won't break generic > code, I don't know nothing about mingw-64 to give you any meaningful > advice. > > Uros. Thanks for your review! I know that this is a large patch set and I know that I could have chosen a simpler "first gcc project", but this particular issue is one that's been itching me for a little while. Also please let me know your opinion about renaming this to -mno-inline-msabi-xlogues (with the default being -minline-msabi-xlogues). Daniel