[PATCH] testsuite, rs6000: Adjust ppc-fortran.exp to support dg-{warning,error}

["Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>]

Hi,

According to Haochen's finding in [1], currently ppc-fortran.exp
doesn't support Fortran specific warning or error messages well.
By looking into it, it's due to that gfortran uses some different
warning/error prefixes as follows:

    set gcc_warning_prefix "\[Ww\]arning:"
    set gcc_error_prefix "(Fatal )?\[Ee\]rror:"

comparing to:

    set gcc_warning_prefix "warning:"
    set gcc_error_prefix "(fatal )?error:"

So this is to override these two prefixes and make it support
dg-{warning,error} checks.

Tested on powerpc64-linux-gnu P7/P8/P9 and
powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9/P10.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-March/613302.html

BR,
Kewen
-----

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ppc-fortran.exp: Override
	gcc_{warning,error}_prefix with Fortran specific one used in
	gfortran_init.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ppc-fortran.exp | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ppc-fortran.exp b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ppc-fortran.exp
index a556d7b48a3..f7e99ac8487 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ppc-fortran.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ppc-fortran.exp
@@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ proc dg-compile-aux-modules { args } {
     }
 }

+# Override gcc_{warning,error}_prefix with Fortran specific prefixes used
+# in gfortran_init to support dg-{warning,error} checks.
+set gcc_warning_prefix "\[Ww\]arning:"
+set gcc_error_prefix "(Fatal )?\[Ee\]rror:"
+
 # Main loop.
 gfortran-dg-runtest [lsort \
        [glob -nocomplain $srcdir/$subdir/*.\[fF\]{,90,95,03,08} ] ] "" $DEFAULT_FFLAGS
--
2.39.1