From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6AE43858D1E for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 14:17:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B6AE43858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 281EH8OK011640; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 14:17:19 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=0tba2jGovSbZ8l0G8D1uz4shwwPP+Jvv4J4rMiJp61U=; b=Np9fHd20+UBRXeR7L1/gZZsyXdtkkXhQzEYtPJeRFV1UNVFI00mKcJbJIQQkJDnk7t8O ztnmwVJXqCG2Cr1q0vJQeF2IHnnWinz+HWQAQcNIsLzaL5FSNEdEHSKiDRb7bBAwdZ+d 4zMymgRgATPHA++DSrwZwtSmn9LsnmycyF0SBjAMDsNiKcc4kkOkoByOcxXUTy++TliQ nsfv8y07+qsd8hfHa5FgBFc1Z3AMynddoLFcJKlJHbgUPgAKNMCgoPNh6tiH4PcpE/mW IUSrzlqjP5sMDH8F4knhEqAO47OXXTcIub6+Uk4MaJ5ZOWCXBvakJly0o/5b5PGA6UFv Mg== Received: from ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (1a.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.26]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3jax9xgdwc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:17:16 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 281E5QcF004031; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 14:17:09 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.29]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3j7awa1sgp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:17:09 +0000 Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.106]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 281EH8c057016582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 1 Sep 2022 14:17:08 GMT Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A4E2805A; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 14:17:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05C828059; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 14:17:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.160.4.32] (unknown [9.160.4.32]) by b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 14:17:07 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <6099d400-1030-e6ae-f114-5ad630b7bd03@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:17:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Don't ICE when we disassemble an MMA variable [PR101322] Content-Language: en-US To: "Kewen.Lin" Cc: GCC Patches , Segher Boessenkool References: <9c6a44db-1239-466a-2990-42207b7eb264@linux.ibm.com> <6cf4ceb2-9deb-93b4-bd94-ab08c08eb330@linux.ibm.com> <20220831205126.GU25951@gate.crashing.org> <67da6fae-184d-4414-cb04-53e295abc477@linux.ibm.com> From: Peter Bergner In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: e0xmBQq38n-fKuUspxp5VhrEi2TXUyJY X-Proofpoint-GUID: e0xmBQq38n-fKuUspxp5VhrEi2TXUyJY X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-09-01_10,2022-08-31_03,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=924 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2207270000 definitions=main-2209010063 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 9/1/22 3:29 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote: >> I have no idea why ptr_vector_*_type would behave differently here than >> build_pointer_type (vector_*_type_node). Using the build_pointer_type() >> fixed it for me, so that's why I went with it. :-) Maybe this is a bug >> in lto??? > > Thanks for your time to reproduce this! > > The only difference is that ptr_vector_*_type are built from the > qualified_type based on vector_*_type_node, instead of directly from > vector_*_type_node. I'm interested to have a further look at this later. If you look into this, please let me know. I'd like to know what you find out. Peter