From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE7E3855582 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2023 20:51:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5DE7E3855582 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-51fdc1a1270so574753a12.1 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:51:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681851073; x=1684443073; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Zbqzxan8W0rramkFKnQHMixXZkzqS1olCe67RCCsa1I=; b=RhhGJo1pYDbE+tbH/zifbwnYNFqzmYYX8FDVQKjwTuzUVOPdnvHauvLpNeI+j6gF7G cwCkJrlrteoJOWFaB4KmYnWRNz0qbKw+F8CMnDdSRVuKOHohaB/vUVqbKT4LerzpU49c 9IGW6s+fgs74eFc22qy9+ivB0ciNK6IjhPMBXqk2d8Wyl6TuDL2fsUMf07N74smxczw6 b7ytUIXL2/sLECAt/raIldSZ07e33BSwemCOCQoJ36Hk6Xt4PT2gC95t+oGySHmdLLUR 8NJopf6zopAm2XkuEiqP+pm+UgSAv7j1aJbCEhODgOAHZlZ7iCpgkc9Ql5/PTDcsCnlR 7oRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681851073; x=1684443073; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Zbqzxan8W0rramkFKnQHMixXZkzqS1olCe67RCCsa1I=; b=Dg95ARAWYZwiw6lqEHxo91bgZ98AN2CfokskxHrxAtPNk1wAFnsT7/c4buEHXIPJYR Zq+Ls9dynC0g6VVlyNmZjJCgvd+H/mlYPw8P+xwPD0Xe0Fs9Eyhf85Xx+PH5UO7wvvLg PQrm9M+6DqACI7H2FwdmT/xRIReOI7zQFRN0Rs4LL5Igx5/l446p75E1Pfyg4Lj4B2Qu gcaOj9vuzFB9k9v2hU88vYzIXrtxZBBpDBH9H9iVM5GwrTsIubf2NFaCDJmVwrGZQZGe ciuiFVTErn/32LPtk9ISpczm2X/fKfN15JYfjK6p5Fy32FGPfU4P+iDlUHLjjpLoSXpy 7KXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9cMT5IS5oinEpRN7qOHoNHDwyfspyW7ZIbxKHH2Z0h7FmKdiuZX 6wSWaoZpVavmJ3XgCD5qp6c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bcOiKNuKRpGn70VBP6x9NGGiE9zqhHXky4Z5KrLt5JeV8suni9nKru5afsU2eeuE5ZDO1VPw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bb14:b0:23e:fc9c:930 with SMTP id u20-20020a17090abb1400b0023efc9c0930mr682451pjr.36.1681851073341; Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:51:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2601:681:8600:13d0::f0a? ([2601:681:8600:13d0::f0a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id il7-20020a17090b164700b00247150f2091sm23245pjb.8.2023.04.18.13.51.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <61c1cf2c-56ec-91f3-74d2-3e9692d19d10@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:51:11 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add -gcodeview option Content-Language: en-US To: Jason Merrill , Mark Harmstone , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, martin@martin.st References: <20221027033829.22918-1-mark@harmstone.com> <435ca5c4-e680-7aa1-b9ac-e28bbbff7334@gmail.com> <0f2259cf-4c67-6d2a-01ea-6e013248cab0@harmstone.com> <88900601-b555-d712-9dbb-b44fcea386e9@gmail.com> From: Jeff Law In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 4/18/23 14:32, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 4/18/23 15:57, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: >> >> >> On 11/20/22 09:54, Mark Harmstone wrote: >>> On 20/11/22 16:43, Jeff Law wrote: >>>> >>>> On 10/26/22 21:38, Mark Harmstone wrote: >>>>> Changed to double dashes as per >>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604287.html. >>>> >>>> What value is there in providing this option now?  IIUC we don't >>>> have any of the bits yet to actually produce PDB records.   It seems >>>> to me like this ought to be patch 1/n of a patch to produce PDB >>>> debug symbols. >>> >>> This isn't useless, as ld will create symbols for the mangled names >>> even without the .debug$S and .debug$T sections being present. > >> Sorry this didn't get resolved for gcc-13.  The good news is I have >> committed your V2 patch into the trunk for gcc-14. > > FYI I've removed the stray obsolete @gol that broke building the docs. Thanks. I didn't realize those were obsolete. jeff