public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: PING Re: [PATCH 07/10] value-relation.h: add 'final' and 'override' to relation_oracle vfunc impls
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 09:33:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <63d8b4a2-77f5-a7f7-7b93-87f29185b91c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8d3e4e47a6bf2905b1a806234423c2eabd2d546b.camel@redhat.com>

On 6/13/22 21:24, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 20:45 -0400, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> Final implies we can't further derive from the derived class, right?
> "final" on a vfunc implies that nothing overrides that vfunc, but you
> could still have further derived classes.
>
> You can think of it as "nothing further overrides this vfunc", as both
> a hint to the human reader, and an optimization hint to the compiler.
>
> You can always just remove the "final" if you want to override it in
> the future (unless the override is happening in a plugin, I suppose).
>
>> If so
>> we may want just override.
> "override" is indeed probably more useful, in that it documents to
> compilers and human readers that you intend this to override a vfunc.
>
> FWIW I wrote the patch by using both "final" and "override", and then
> dropping the "final" everywhere I needed to to get it to compile.
>
> Dave
>
>
>> Andrew, what are your thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks for doing this.

OK by me.

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-23 19:28 [PATCH 00/10] Add 'final' and 'override' where missing David Malcolm
2022-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 01/10] Add 'final' and 'override' to opt_pass vfunc impls David Malcolm
2022-06-13 18:22   ` PING: " David Malcolm
2022-06-24 18:08     ` PING^2: " David Malcolm
2022-06-24 18:45       ` Jeff Law
2022-06-27 21:16         ` David Malcolm
2022-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 02/10] Add 'final' and 'override' on dom_walker " David Malcolm
2022-06-13 18:23   ` PING " David Malcolm
2022-06-24 18:10     ` PING^2 " David Malcolm
2022-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 03/10] expr.cc: use final/override on op_by_pieces_d vfuncs David Malcolm
2022-06-13 18:25   ` PING: " David Malcolm
2022-06-24 18:12     ` PING^2 : " David Malcolm
2022-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 04/10] tree-switch-conversion.h: use final/override for cluster vfunc impls David Malcolm
2022-06-13 18:26   ` PING " David Malcolm
2022-06-24 18:14     ` PING^2 : " David Malcolm
2022-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 05/10] d: add 'final' and 'override' to gcc/d/*.cc 'visit' impls David Malcolm
2022-05-24 12:56   ` Iain Buclaw
2022-05-24 13:15     ` David Malcolm
2022-05-24 15:11       ` Iain Buclaw
2022-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 06/10] ipa: add 'final' and 'override' to call_summary_base vfunc impls David Malcolm
2022-05-24  7:36   ` Martin Liška
2022-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 07/10] value-relation.h: add 'final' and 'override' to relation_oracle " David Malcolm
2022-06-13 18:28   ` PING " David Malcolm
2022-06-14  0:45     ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-06-14  1:24       ` David Malcolm
2022-06-15 13:33         ` Andrew MacLeod [this message]
2022-06-15 21:58           ` David Malcolm
2022-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] i386: add 'final' and 'override' to scalar_chain " David Malcolm
2022-06-13 18:30   ` PING: " David Malcolm
2022-06-24 18:19     ` PING^2 : " David Malcolm
2022-06-24 20:58       ` Uros Bizjak
2022-06-27 21:25         ` David Malcolm
2022-08-16  8:55       ` [PATCH][pushed] i386: add 'final' and 'override' to scalar_chain Martin Liška
2022-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 09/10] tree-vect-slp-patterns.cc: add 'final' and 'override' to vect_pattern::build impls David Malcolm
2022-05-24  6:44   ` Richard Biener
2022-05-23 19:28 ` [PATCH 10/10] Add 'final' and 'override' in various places David Malcolm
2022-06-13 18:30   ` PING " David Malcolm
2022-06-24 18:20     ` PING^2: " David Malcolm
2022-05-25  3:29 ` [PATCH 00/10] Add 'final' and 'override' where missing Eric Gallager

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=63d8b4a2-77f5-a7f7-7b93-87f29185b91c@redhat.com \
    --to=amacleod@redhat.com \
    --cc=aldyh@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).