From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 613063858D20 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 12:40:12 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 613063858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C5A33E8C; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 07:40:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from naga.localdomain (188-23-1-149.adsl.highway.telekom.at [188.23.1.149]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36E8A33E89; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 07:40:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 13:40:09 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Hongtao Liu cc: "H.J. Lu" , liuhongt , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [GCC12] Mention Intel AVX512-FP16 and _Float16 support. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <6481635f-dd61-8c06-4841-4e1bf9aa5133@pfeifer.com> References: <20210924011730.97039-1-hongtao.liu@intel.com> <6feb6e5-878c-93ee-61ee-adb2b0c8e979@pfeifer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.10 on 209.68.5.143 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Fri, 8 Oct 2021, Hongtao Liu wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2021, Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches wrote: >>> +
  • New ISA extension support for Intel AVX512-FP16 was added to GCC. >>> + AVX512FP16 intrinsics are available [...] >> So, is it AVX512-FP16 or AVX512FP16? > Sorry for the confusion, the official name is AVX512-FP16[1], and for > simplicity, AVX512FP16 is used in the mail thread. Shouldn't we then consistently use AVX512-FP16 here (gcc-12/changes.html) and in gcc/doc/invoke.texi where there are three instances of AVX512FP16 (without the dash)? Gerald