From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E033B385B835 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:38:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E033B385B835 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mliska@suse.cz X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31FDAC24; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check DECL_CONTEXT of new/delete operators. To: Jan Hubicka , Richard Biener Cc: GCC Patches , Marc Glisse References: <20200331122907.GB62067@kam.mff.cuni.cz> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= Message-ID: <65230a52-c025-a6e3-0d31-409d37e9b2c9@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:38:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200331122907.GB62067@kam.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:38:12 -0000 On 3/31/20 2:29 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Well, I basically went through all pointers and tried to get rid of as > many of them as possible. CONTEXT pointers do increase size of SCCs > that increases chance they will not get merged and also processing time > of merging algorithm. I guess if we need to stream more contexts we > could do that (and check the effect on merging and average SCC size) Ok, do we want to stream contexts just for the new/delete operators? Can you please prepare a streaming patch? Thank you, Martin