From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: Add VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR to operand_equal_p
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6561C1C3-366A-411C-BAEE-65E1C233BA16@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6178124.DYpozsCQOi@polaris>
On October 17, 2015 11:26:43 AM GMT+02:00, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>> Well, it would (I think) ICE on assigning a packed variant to a
>non-packed
>> variant of a strict that happens to get a non-BLKmode when not
>packed.
>
>Is "it" GIMPLE here? My sentence was not very clear, I meant that I
>don't see
>why GIMPLE would have to care about whether there is a VCE or not in
>the IL.
Huh, I thought your question was about the mode check in useless_type_conversion_p.
>And AFAIK nobody answered the question: what do we gain by making this
>change?
>So far I have only seen breakages, suspicious fixes and code
>duplication...
Honza wants the structural equality predicate (operand_equal_p) complete (optimistically) for GIMPLE.
Richard.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-17 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-14 16:29 Jan Hubicka
2015-10-15 8:39 ` Richard Biener
2015-10-15 11:22 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-15 19:47 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-15 23:24 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-16 15:58 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-16 21:47 ` Richard Biener
2015-10-17 10:27 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-17 15:17 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2015-10-17 18:57 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-18 12:57 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-18 16:37 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-18 17:14 ` Richard Biener
2015-10-18 18:45 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-19 12:31 ` Richard Biener
2015-10-19 21:01 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-19 8:17 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-19 7:58 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-19 19:46 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-20 7:02 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-21 22:22 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-22 8:52 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-10-28 22:49 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-29 4:35 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-29 11:31 ` Richard Biener
2015-10-29 11:32 ` Richard Biener
2015-10-29 11:32 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-04 8:51 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-29 15:06 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-29 15:24 ` Richard Biener
2015-10-29 15:53 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-30 8:57 ` Richard Biener
2015-10-30 15:28 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-11-02 9:55 ` Richard Biener
2015-10-30 9:56 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-30 15:19 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-31 17:39 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-31 17:58 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-03 10:26 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-11-03 11:39 ` Richard Biener
2015-11-02 9:30 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-11-03 8:43 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-11-04 7:23 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-11-04 8:20 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-11-04 16:50 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-11-05 13:49 ` Richard Biener
2015-10-21 4:42 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-21 8:54 ` Richard Biener
2015-10-21 11:24 ` Eric Botcazou
2015-10-23 5:22 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-10-23 9:14 ` Richard Biener
2015-10-15 16:59 ` Jan Hubicka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6561C1C3-366A-411C-BAEE-65E1C233BA16@gmail.com \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=ebotcazou@adacore.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).