From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11925 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2007 23:20:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 11917 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Sep 2007 23:20:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:20:10 +0000 Received: from zps36.corp.google.com (zps36.corp.google.com [172.25.146.36]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id l8DNK8tH030172 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:20:08 -0700 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (pybp76.prod.google.com [10.34.92.76]) by zps36.corp.google.com with ESMTP id l8DNK7JO024899 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:20:07 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so1353400pyb for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.106.15 with SMTP id i15mr1457739pym.1189725606678; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.116.18 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <65dd6fd50709131620n6644465aheceacf296377be91@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:30:00 -0000 From: "Ollie Wild" To: "Joseph S. Myers" Subject: Re: PATCH: Add format string suggestions to -Wformat warnings Cc: "Dan Hipschman" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070814235109.GD11055@google.com> <20070821222124.GE11055@google.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg01225.txt.bz2 On 9/13/07, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > We're moving away from having dg-* as regular expressions to match > multiple messages on one line to having a separate dg-* for each > diagnostic (that way, you know if only some of the expected diagnostics on > a line have disappeared). That seems reasonable, but it contradicts feedback I've gotten from previous patches. For example, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg00119.html. For consistency's sake, it might be worth publishing a test guidelines doc. Or does such a beast already exist? Ollie