public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	gcc-patches List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][RFC] Canonize names of attributes.
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <669c960e-f4a8-eae3-efd2-f8c29477a817@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADzB+2=o6Wr1jyhk3P2JNYP92B0W6iLcZdgcb8GK3hdMTSjW4Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/03/2017 11:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:52 AM, Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>> On 06/30/2017 09:34 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>>>> This is v2 of the patch, where just names of attributes are canonicalized.
>>>> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>>>
>>> What is the purpose of the new "strict" parameter to cmp_attribs* ?  I
>>> don't see any discussion of it.
>>
>> It's needed for arguments of attribute names, like:
>>
>> /usr/include/stdio.h:391:62: internal compiler error: in cmp_attribs, at tree.h:5523
>>        __THROWNL __attribute__ ((__format__ (__printf__, 3, 4)));
>>
> 
> Mm.  Although we don't want to automatically canonicalize all
> identifier arguments to attributes in the parser, we could still do it
> for specific attributes, e.g. in handle_format_attribute or
> handle_mode_attribute.

Yep, that was done in my previous version of the patch (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg00996.html).
Where only attribute that was preserved unchanged was 'cleanup':

diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index 8f638785e0e..08b4db5e5bd 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -24765,7 +24765,8 @@ cp_parser_gnu_attribute_list (cp_parser* parser)
  		  tree tv;
  		  if (arguments != NULL_TREE
  		      && ((tv = TREE_VALUE (arguments)) != NULL_TREE)
-		      && TREE_CODE (tv) == IDENTIFIER_NODE)
+		      && TREE_CODE (tv) == IDENTIFIER_NODE
+		      && !id_equal (TREE_PURPOSE (attribute), "cleanup"))
  		    TREE_VALUE (arguments) = canonize_attr_name (tv);
  		  release_tree_vector (vec);
  		}

Does it work for you to do it so?

Martin

> 
> Jason
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-11 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-13 12:32 [PATCH][RFC] " Martin Liška
2017-06-13 13:20 ` Richard Biener
2017-06-14  7:48   ` Martin Liška
2017-06-14  9:07     ` Richard Biener
2017-06-14 11:03       ` Martin Liška
2017-06-14 11:19         ` Richard Biener
2017-06-14 16:40       ` Joseph Myers
2017-06-28 14:45         ` Martin Liška
2017-06-14 17:24 ` Jason Merrill
2017-06-16  0:07   ` Martin Sebor
2017-06-28 14:46   ` Martin Liška
2017-06-28 16:06     ` Joseph Myers
2017-06-28 19:01       ` Jason Merrill
2017-06-30  9:23         ` [PATCH v2][RFC] " Martin Liška
2017-06-30 19:35           ` Jason Merrill
2017-07-03  9:52             ` Martin Liška
2017-07-03 21:00               ` Jason Merrill
2017-07-11 13:38                 ` Martin Liška [this message]
2017-07-11 15:52                   ` Jason Merrill
2017-07-13 13:48                     ` Martin Liška
2017-07-13 13:51                       ` [RFC][PATCH] Do refactoring of attribute functions and move them to attribs.[hc] Martin Liška
2017-07-14  7:23                         ` Jeff Law
2017-07-14  7:40                           ` Martin Liška
2017-08-04 13:53                           ` Martin Liška
2017-08-08  4:37                             ` Martin Liška
2017-08-08  9:14                               ` Tom de Vries
2017-09-12  7:55                         ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-09-12 11:31                           ` Martin Liška
2017-09-12 11:40                             ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-09-12 14:25                               ` Martin Liška
2017-07-27 12:57                       ` [PATCH v2][RFC] Canonize names of attributes Martin Liška
2017-08-02 11:25                       ` Joseph Myers
2017-08-04 13:43                         ` Martin Liška
2017-08-04 16:54                           ` Jason Merrill
2017-08-07 16:44                             ` [PATCH][OBVIOUS] Fix missing include of header file in mips.c Martin Liška
2017-08-07 17:10                               ` [PATCH][OBVIOUS] Add missing header file attribs.h to couple of targets Martin Liška
2017-08-02 19:42                       ` [PATCH v2][RFC] Canonize names of attributes Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=669c960e-f4a8-eae3-efd2-f8c29477a817@suse.cz \
    --to=mliska@suse.cz \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).