From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 61520 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2017 18:50:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 61506 invoked by uid 89); 2 Aug 2017 18:50:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-11.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.158.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 18:50:02 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v72InBQT094517 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 14:50:00 -0400 Received: from e13.ny.us.ibm.com (e13.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.203]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2c3ftndjqv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 14:50:00 -0400 Received: from localhost by e13.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 14:49:59 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.23) by e13.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.200) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 14:49:57 -0400 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id v72InvQ624510510; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 18:49:57 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA711AE043; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 14:50:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bigmac.rchland.ibm.com (unknown [9.10.86.172]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97C9FAE04B; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 14:50:11 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Clean up capitalized diagnostic messages From: Bill Schmidt In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 18:50:00 -0000 Cc: Jakub Jelinek , GCC Patches , Segher Boessenkool , David Edelsohn Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <9a2980f0-01ed-1474-c4a2-f743695d60f8@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170802155511.GL2123@tucnak> To: Joseph Myers X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17080218-0008-0000-0000-000002687AF3 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00007472; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000216; SDB=6.00896600; UDB=6.00448543; IPR=6.00676787; BA=6.00005506; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00016501; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2017-08-02 18:49:59 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17080218-0009-0000-0000-0000363DF99C Message-Id: <677B39AD-D25E-4844-BF0D-FA824C944078@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-08-02_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1706020000 definitions=main-1708020303 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-08/txt/msg00227.txt.bz2 On Aug 2, 2017, at 11:04 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 10:29:20AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote: >>> --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (revision 250791) >>> +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (working copy) >>> @@ -4132,7 +4132,7 @@ rs6000_option_override_internal (bool global_init_ >>> || rs6000_cpu == PROCESSOR_PPCE5500) >>> { >>> if (TARGET_ALTIVEC) >>> - error ("AltiVec not supported in this target"); >>> + error ("altivec not supported in this target"); >> >> If AltiVec is spelled that way always, then I think we want to keep it >> capitalized, but CCing Joseph just to be sure. Or the diagnostics > > Yes, if it would be capitalized mid-sentence then it should be capitalized > at the start of a diagnostic (and if it wouldn't be capitalized > mid-sentence, it shouldn't be capitalized at the start of a diagnostic). Honestly, if I had my way we would retroactively change all the "altivec/Altivec/AltiVec" inconsistencies to "VMX". ;-) But given the ubiquity of (lowercase there) I suppose that's not practical... I'll return this one to AltiVec, and change "GCC vector" to "GNU vector" if that's okay with everyone. Bill > > -- > Joseph S. Myers > joseph@codesourcery.com >