From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c, c++: Allow ignoring -Winit-self through pragmas [PR105593]
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 21:49:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6872691a-ee0a-d75b-2d03-684538fc8a1e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y8CmpuU+Js7Tlsqz@tucnak>
On 1/12/23 19:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As mentioned in the PR, various x86 intrinsics need to return
> an uninitialized vector. Currently they use self initialization
> to avoid -Wuninitialized warnings, which works fine in C, but
> doesn't work in C++ where -Winit-self is enabled in -Wall.
> We don't have an attribute to mark a variable as knowingly
> uninitialized (the uninitialized attribute exists but means
> something else, only in the -ftrivial-auto-var-init context),
> and trying to suppress either -Wuninitialized or -Winit-self
> inside of the _mm_undefined_ps etc. intrinsic definitions
> doesn't work, one needs to currently disable through pragmas
> -Wuninitialized warning at the point where _mm_undefined_ps etc.
> result is actually used, but that goes against the intent of
> those intrinsics.
>
> The -Winit-self warning option actually doesn't do any warning,
> all we do is record a suppression for -Winit-self if !warn_init_self
> on the decl definition and later look that up in uninit pass.
>
> The following patch changes those !warn_init_self tests which
> are true only based on the command line option setting, not based
> on GCC diagnostic pragma overrides to
> !warning_enabled_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl), OPT_Winit_self)
> such that it takes them into account.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK on Monday if the C maintainers don't comment.
> Will post incremental patch for the intrinsic headers.
>
> 2023-01-13 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR c++/105593
> gcc/c/
> * c-parser.cc (c_parser_initializer): Check warning_enabled_at
> at the DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl) for OPT_Winit_self instead
> of warn_init_self.
> gcc/cp/
> * decl.cc (cp_finish_decl): Check warning_enabled_at
> at the DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl) for OPT_Winit_self instead
> of warn_init_self.
> gcc/testsuite/
> * c-c++-common/Winit-self3.c: New test.
> * c-c++-common/Winit-self4.c: New test.
> * c-c++-common/Winit-self5.c: New test.
>
> --- gcc/c/c-parser.cc.jj 2023-01-11 22:18:25.560492345 +0100
> +++ gcc/c/c-parser.cc 2023-01-12 15:30:10.460233783 +0100
> @@ -5701,7 +5701,7 @@ c_parser_initializer (c_parser *parser,
> && !DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)
> && !TREE_STATIC (decl)
> && ret.value == decl
> - && !warn_init_self)
> + && !warning_enabled_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl), OPT_Winit_self))
> suppress_warning (decl, OPT_Winit_self);
> if (TREE_CODE (ret.value) != STRING_CST
> && (TREE_CODE (ret.value) != COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR
> --- gcc/cp/decl.cc.jj 2023-01-04 18:42:24.597997547 +0100
> +++ gcc/cp/decl.cc 2023-01-12 15:26:01.257817526 +0100
> @@ -8407,7 +8407,7 @@ cp_finish_decl (tree decl, tree init, bo
> if (!DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)
> && !TREE_STATIC (decl)
> && decl == tree_strip_any_location_wrapper (init)
> - && !warn_init_self)
> + && !warning_enabled_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl), OPT_Winit_self))
> suppress_warning (decl, OPT_Winit_self);
> }
>
> --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Winit-self3.c.jj 2023-01-12 15:49:56.759172518 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Winit-self3.c 2023-01-12 15:50:51.512384963 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/* PR c++/105593 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-W -Wall" } */
> +
> +void bar (int);
> +
> +static inline int
> +baz (void)
> +{
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Winit-self"
> + int u = u; /* { dg-bogus "'u' is used uninitialized" } */
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
> + return u;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> + int u = baz ();
> + bar (u);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int
> +qux (void)
> +{
> + int u = u; /* { dg-warning "'u' is used uninitialized" "" { target c++ } } */
> + return u; /* { dg-message "'u' was declared here" "" { target c++ } .-1 } */
> +}
> +
> +void
> +corge (void)
> +{
> + int u = qux ();
> + bar (u);
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Winit-self4.c.jj 2023-01-12 15:50:15.233906776 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Winit-self4.c 2023-01-12 15:50:42.445515372 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/* PR c++/105593 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-W -Wall -Winit-self" } */
> +
> +void bar (int);
> +
> +static inline int
> +baz (void)
> +{
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Winit-self"
> + int u = u; /* { dg-bogus "'u' is used uninitialized" } */
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
> + return u;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> + int u = baz ();
> + bar (u);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int
> +qux (void)
> +{
> + int u = u; /* { dg-warning "'u' is used uninitialized" } */
> + return u; /* { dg-message "'u' was declared here" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
> +}
> +
> +void
> +corge (void)
> +{
> + int u = qux ();
> + bar (u);
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Winit-self5.c.jj 2023-01-12 15:51:01.045247847 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Winit-self5.c 2023-01-12 15:51:12.929076923 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/* PR c++/105593 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-W -Wall -Wno-init-self" } */
> +
> +void bar (int);
> +
> +static inline int
> +baz (void)
> +{
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Winit-self"
> + int u = u; /* { dg-bogus "'u' is used uninitialized" } */
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
> + return u;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> + int u = baz ();
> + bar (u);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int
> +qux (void)
> +{
> + int u = u; /* { dg-bogus "'u' is used uninitialized" } */
> + return u;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +corge (void)
> +{
> + int u = qux ();
> + bar (u);
> +}
>
> Jakub
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-13 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-13 0:32 Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-13 2:49 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2023-01-13 13:48 ` Marek Polacek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6872691a-ee0a-d75b-2d03-684538fc8a1e@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=polacek@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).