From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 53340 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2017 16:33:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 51594 invoked by uid 89); 7 Mar 2017 16:33:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Applied, opinions X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:33:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6DD561B92; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-120-51.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.51] (may be forged)) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v27GXahA013912; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:33:36 -0500 Subject: Re: i386-unknown-freebsd -> i586-unknown-freebsd To: Gerald Pfeifer , Richard Biener References: <5742CA86.10200@foss.arm.com> Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan , Andreas Tobler , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <699ecba5-b290-0ad3-5294-aab4e2dbc54b@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:33:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00321.txt.bz2 On 03/04/2017 09:44 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Tue, 24 May 2016, Richard Biener wrote: >> Can we update to a non-marketing name then, like i586-unknown-freebsd >> please? config.gcc accepts i[34567]86-*-freebsd*. It at least confused >> me. > > Of course, once I hacked config.gcc, I realized that the simple > patch below is all you actually may have had in mind. ;-) > > Applied. > > But let's still consider the config.guess change for GCC 7 as > well, or people might not be _appearing_ to use it, even if it > is practically the same? No strong opinions here. Certainly fixing the triplet on the critera page is a good thing. Jeff