Yes. We want to be consistent. I am planning to change all previous "LEN_MASK_*" into "MASK_LEN_*"



juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
 
From: Robin Dapp
Date: 2023-07-20 14:22
To: juzhe.zhong; gcc-patches
CC: rdapp.gcc; richard.sandiford; rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VECT: Support floating-point in-order reduction for length loop control
Hi Juzhe,
 
I just noticed that we recently started calling things MASK_LEN
(instead of LEN_MASK before) with the reductions.  Wouldn't we want
to be consistent here?  Especially as the length takes precedence.
I realize the preparational work like optabs is already upstream
but still wanted to bring it up.
 
Regards
Robin