On 09/07/2016 09:45 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 6 September 2016 at 15:45, Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>> On 09/06/2016 03:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> sizeof (gcov_type) talks about the host gcov type, you want instead the
>>> target gcov type.  So
>>> TYPE_SIZE (gcov_type_node) == 32 vs. 64 (or TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (gcov_type_node)
>>> == 4 vs. 8).
>>> As SImode and DImode are in fact 4*BITS_PER_UNIT and 8*BITS_PER_UNIT,
>>> TYPE_SIZE_UNIT comparisons for 4 and 8 are most natural.
>>> And I wouldn't add gcc_unreachable, just warn for weirdo arches always.
>>>
>>>       Jakub
>>
>> Thank you Jakub for helping me with that. I've used TYPE_SIZE_UNIT macro.
>>
>> Ready for trunk?
>> Martin
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> On targets which do not support atomic profile update, your patch generates a
> warning on gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-profiler-threads-1.c, making it fail.
> 
> Do we need a new effective-target ?
> 
> Christophe
> 

Hi.

Thanks for observation, I'm sending a patch that does that.
Can you please test it?

Thanks,
Martin