From: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
To: Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>,
David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000/test: Add emulated gather test case
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 13:31:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69c61c69-91ca-9be6-4060-01bc9ce7f94b@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMZc-bxH=sN6TdyWjiN1JqRV+GbRE2cdO8AQHPSs7sv6FOQhug@mail.gmail.com>
on 2021/11/25 下午1:17, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:21 AM Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch is to add a test case similar to the one in i386
>> to add testing coverage for 510.parest_r hotspots.
>>
>> As evaluated, the emulated gather capability of vectorizer
>> (r12-2733) can help to speed up SPEC2017 510.parest_r on
>> Power8/9/10 by 5% to 9% with option sets Ofast unroll and
>> Ofast lto. But since rs6000 missed unpacking support for
>> unsigned int before, it can only vectorize the hotspots
>> until r12-3134.
>>
>> By checking why r12-2733 doesn't immediately show its impact
>> for SPEC2017 510.parest_r while the associated test case
>> already can get vectorized on rs6000 at that time, I realized
>> the associated test case use int as INDEXTYPE while the
>> hotspots actually use unsigned int. So different from the one
>> in i386, this patch uses unsigned int as INDEXTYPE since the
>> unpack support for unsigned int (r12-3134) also matters for
>> the hotspots vectorization. Not sure if it's worth to updating
>> the one in i386 as well?
> It looks like the same testcase added in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88531
Thanks for the information! Good to know that there are already
some cases to cover. :)
BR,
Kewen
>>
>> Tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9 and powerpc64-linux-gnu P8.
>>
>> Is it ok for trunk?
>>
>> BR,
>> Kewen
>> -----
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * gcc.target/powerpc/vect-gather-1.c: New test.
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vect-gather-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vect-gather-1.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..bf98045ab03
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vect-gather-1.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* Profitable from Power8 since it supports efficient unaligned load. */
>> +/* { dg-options "-Ofast -mdejagnu-cpu=power8 -fdump-tree-vect-details -fdump-tree-forwprop4" } */
>> +
>> +#ifndef INDEXTYPE
>> +#define INDEXTYPE unsigned int
>> +#endif
>> +double vmul(INDEXTYPE *rowstart, INDEXTYPE *rowend,
>> + double *luval, double *dst)
>> +{
>> + double res = 0;
>> + for (const INDEXTYPE * col = rowstart; col != rowend; ++col, ++luval)
>> + res += *luval * dst[*col];
>> + return res;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* With gather emulation this should be profitable to vectorize from Power8. */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "loop vectorized" "vect" } } */
>> +/* The index vector loads and promotions should be scalar after forwprop. */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "vec_unpack" "forwprop4" } } */
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-25 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-25 3:20 Kewen.Lin
2021-11-25 5:17 ` Hongtao Liu
2021-11-25 5:31 ` Kewen.Lin [this message]
2021-11-26 16:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-11-29 2:03 ` Kewen.Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69c61c69-91ca-9be6-4060-01bc9ce7f94b@linux.ibm.com \
--to=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=crazylht@gmail.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=wschmidt@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).