From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-315652-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29070 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2012 09:29:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 29054 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2012 09:29:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:28:57 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64578290079;	Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:29:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with ESMTP id awIupHs0fOBh; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:29:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67])	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270AC290074;	Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:29:00 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO9iq9GxYzSUeWLY-hua7z1pSYpc5kdTXyYZng9sJRJ-MT+rYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:29:00 -0000
Cc: Tobias Burnus <tobias.burnus@physik.fu-berlin.de>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, fortran@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6C5A80FF-4B39-449A-B015-00D537483F08@adacore.com>
References: <20120320094857.GB27039@physik.fu-berlin.de> <BB208731-93A2-45B4-95C4-C8179CB4FAC3@adacore.com> <4F6AF98F.1000005@redhat.com> <EC7480F6-60BC-425D-BF60-93FEEF0DAE57@adacore.com> <CAO9iq9EY51vCwj_BN3z9h7GEVWPm2g7wjgVGmuQuyg_tESx89Q@mail.gmail.com> <E897B64E-578C-466F-A1C2-BF75327F3B83@adacore.com> <1CF02DE4-A03A-4435-BF26-5C21673B1DA5@adacore.com> <CAO9iq9GxYzSUeWLY-hua7z1pSYpc5kdTXyYZng9sJRJ-MT+rYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist.janne@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg01711.txt.bz2


On Mar 27, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:01, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrot=
e:
>> Hi,
>>=20
>> this patch fixes this issue.  Is it OK ?
>=20
> Ok.

No check-gfortran regressions on x86_64-darwin, committed.

>> Maybe we should include the AC_DEFINE action within GCC_CHECK_MATH_FUNC.=
  Will try to do that.
>=20
> That looks like a cleaner solution, yes, and less chance for typos to sne=
ak in.
>=20
>> Sorry for not having noticed this issue before.
>=20
> No problem. Thanks for fixing it quickly.

You're welcome!

Tristan.