From: "juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai" <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
To: ams <ams@codesourcery.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: jeffreyalaw <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>, rguenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428.c for RVV
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 19:05:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6C8026CC650A3B51+2023110719052047818826@rivai.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c2e542d-e41f-4cba-9224-8cb8218d7079@codesourcery.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4162 bytes --]
Could you try this ?
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "vect" { xfail { { ! vect_hw_misalign } || { vect512 } } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 4 "vect" { xfail { ! vect512 } } } } */
juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
From: Andrew Stubbs
Date: 2023-11-07 18:59
To: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai; gcc-patches
CC: jeffreyalaw; rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428.c for RVV
On 07/11/2023 10:10, juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai wrote:
> So, this patch not only fixes RVV FAIL, but also fixes GCN ?
Before the patch I have:
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c (test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c scan-tree-dump vect "Detected interleaving
load of size 8"
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c scan-tree-dump vect "Detected interleaving
store of size 16"
gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c: pattern found 4 times
XFAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing
stmts using SLP" 2
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c scan-tree-dump-not vect "gap of 6 elements"
With the patch I now get:
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c (test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c scan-tree-dump vect "Detected interleaving
load of size 8"
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c scan-tree-dump vect "Detected interleaving
store of size 16"
gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c: pattern found 4 times
XFAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing
stmts using SLP" 2
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing
stmts using SLP" 4
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c scan-tree-dump-not vect "gap of 6 elements"
It's different, but not "fixed".
Andrew
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
>
> *From:* Andrew Stubbs <mailto:ams@codesourcery.com>
> *Date:* 2023-11-07 18:09
> *To:* Juzhe-Zhong <mailto:juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>;
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> *CC:* jeffreyalaw@gmail.com <mailto:jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>;
> rguenther@suse.de <mailto:rguenther@suse.de>
> *Subject:* Re: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr97428.c for RVV
> On 07/11/2023 07:44, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> > This test shows vectorizing stmts using SLP 4 times instead of 2
> for RVV.
> > The reason is RVV has 512 bit vector.
> > Here is comparison between RVV ans ARM SVE:
> > https://godbolt.org/z/xc5KE5rPs
> >
> > But I notice AMDGCN also has 512 bit vector, seems this patch
> will cause FAIL in GCN ?
> >
> > Not sure whether GCN is 2 times or 4 times ?
> The pattern matches 4 times on GCN.
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c: Fix FAIL for RVV.
> >
> > ---
> > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c
> > index ad6416096aa..352c9bf04a7 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c
> > @@ -43,5 +43,6 @@ void foo_i2(dcmlx4_t dst[], const dcmlx_t
> src[], int n)
> > /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Detected interleaving store of
> size 16" "vect" } } */
> > /* We're not able to peel & apply re-aligning to make accesses
> well-aligned for !vect_hw_misalign,
> > but we could by peeling the stores for alignment and
> applying re-aligning loads. */
> > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using
> SLP" 2 "vect" { xfail { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using
> SLP" 2 "vect" { xfail { { ! vect_hw_misalign } || { vect512 } } } } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using
> SLP" 4 "vect" { xfail { { ! vect_hw_misalign } || { ! vect512 } } }
> } } */
> > /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "gap of 6 elements" "vect" }
> } */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-07 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-07 7:44 Juzhe-Zhong
2023-11-07 10:09 ` Andrew Stubbs
2023-11-07 10:10 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-11-07 10:59 ` Andrew Stubbs
2023-11-07 11:05 ` juzhe.zhong [this message]
2023-11-07 11:21 ` Andrew Stubbs
2023-11-07 11:23 ` juzhe.zhong
[not found] ` <202311071923515706180@rivai.ai>
2023-11-07 11:24 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-11-07 11:44 ` Andrew Stubbs
2023-11-07 12:03 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-11-07 12:05 ` Andrew Stubbs
2023-11-07 12:07 ` juzhe.zhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6C8026CC650A3B51+2023110719052047818826@rivai.ai \
--to=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
--cc=ams@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).