From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 106646 invoked by alias); 20 May 2015 10:06:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 106632 invoked by uid 89); 20 May 2015 10:06:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mailapp01.imgtec.com Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com (HELO mailapp01.imgtec.com) (195.59.15.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 May 2015 10:06:06 +0000 Received: from KLMAIL01.kl.imgtec.org (unknown [192.168.5.35]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id AC21DEB8F22F2; Wed, 20 May 2015 11:06:01 +0100 (IST) Received: from LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org (192.168.152.62) by KLMAIL01.kl.imgtec.org (192.168.5.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 20 May 2015 11:05:00 +0100 Received: from LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org ([fe80::5ae:ee16:f4b9:cda9]) by LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org ([fe80::5ae:ee16:f4b9:cda9%17]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Wed, 20 May 2015 11:05:00 +0100 From: Matthew Fortune To: Robert Suchanek , "Maciej W. Rozycki" CC: "Catherine_Moore@mentor.com" , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Steve Ellcey Subject: RE: [PATCH, MIPS]: Fix internal compiler error: in check_bool_attrs, at recog.c:2218 for micromips attribute Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B023532105C20A@LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org> References: <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B02353210594BF@LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg01801.txt.bz2 > > We could add -mflip-micromips complementing -mflip-mips16 and use > > that for testing too. Chances are it'd reveal further issues. > > Looking at how > > -mflip-mips16 has been implemented it does not appear to me adding > > -mflip-micromips would be a lot of effort. >=20 > I'm in favour of adding such a switch since the testsuite doesn't cover > a mixture of MIPS and microMIPS code. It certainly seems that we need a bit more coverage here in order that we can mostly stick to testing one or two MIPS configurations per commit. We'll have some MIPS machines in the compile farm shortly which may allow us to at least do the full all-config build of the toolchain more easily even if that doesn't extend to testing all the configs. >=20 > Regards, > Robert >=20 > gcc/ > * config/mips/mips.h (micromips_globals): Declare. OK, thanks. Matthew