From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 33787 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2017 20:00:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 33450 invoked by uid 89); 31 Mar 2017 20:00:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-24.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_0,GIT_PATCH_1,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=irritated, enhanced, Virtual, Hx-languages-length:1479 X-HELO: mailapp01.imgtec.com Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com (HELO mailapp01.imgtec.com) (195.59.15.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:00:18 +0000 Received: from hhmail02.hh.imgtec.org (unknown [10.100.10.20]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id F3918255F7153; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 21:00:01 +0100 (IST) Received: from HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org ([fe80::710b:f219:72bc:e0b3]) by hhmail02.hh.imgtec.org ([fe80::5400:d33e:81a4:f775%25]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 21:00:06 +0100 From: Matthew Fortune To: "Moore, Catherine (Catherine_Moore@mentor.com)" CC: "'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' (gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org)" , "roland.illig@gmx.de" Subject: [patch, MIPS] Update -mvirt option description Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B0235380BE22A2@HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg01588.txt.bz2 Hi Catherine, I'm following up on PR target/80057 to update the description of -mvirt. I agree with Roland that the description is inconsistent and should not state 'application specific' as none of the other ASE options include it. Instead I suggest we put the shortened form of (VZ) in like (XPA) is shown for -mxpa. The short form of virtualization ASE is usually VZ not VIRT which has always irritated me about this option name but that is history. What do you think? gcc/ PR target/80057 * config/mips/mips.opt (-mvirt): Update description. Thanks, Matthew diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips.opt b/gcc/config/mips/mips.opt index 7c4b607..ced2432 100644 --- a/gcc/config/mips/mips.opt +++ b/gcc/config/mips/mips.opt @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ Put uninitialized constants in ROM (needs -membedded-da= ta). =20 mvirt Target Report Var(TARGET_VIRT) -Use Virtualization Application Specific instructions. +Use Virtualization (VZ) instructions. =20 mxpa Target Report Var(TARGET_XPA) diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi index 8d3821e..19a85b6 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi @@ -19345,7 +19345,7 @@ Use (do not use) the MIPS Enhanced Virtual Addressi= ng instructions. @itemx -mno-virt @opindex mvirt @opindex mno-virt -Use (do not use) the MIPS Virtualization Application Specific instructions. +Use (do not use) the MIPS Virtualization (VZ) instructions. =20 @item -mxpa @itemx -mno-xpa --=20 2.2.1