From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2792 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2017 19:17:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1812 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jun 2017 19:17:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=wonderful X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 19:17:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB4F8133E; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 21:17:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7hR1tFW35hAs; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 21:17:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.15] (bny92-4-82-228-126-192.fbx.proxad.net [82.228.126.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A58708133D; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 21:17:36 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: common grounds for VxWorks 7 support From: Olivier Hainque In-Reply-To: <0627e79e-4b28-ab68-60a6-4641553f3e03@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 19:17:00 -0000 Cc: Olivier Hainque , GCC Patches , Nathan Sidwell , Jerome Lambourg , Douglas B Rupp Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6EA3E3C5-D979-4AD5-827E-90F720A650E0@adacore.com> References: <0627e79e-4b28-ab68-60a6-4641553f3e03@redhat.com> To: Jeff Law X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg01956.txt.bz2 > On Jun 26, 2017, at 18:44 , Jeff Law wrote: >=20 >> If OK on principle, I'm not sure who is to approve the tiny config.gcc p= art. > I'd think the tiny config.gcc bits would fall under the VxWorks umbrella > and you can self-approve. Wonderful :-) Thanks for confirming Jeff! Olivier