在 2022/11/23 00:44, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
>> While I still can't fully understand the immediate load issue and how
>> this patch fix it, I've tested this patch (alongside the prefetch
>> instruction patch) with bootstrap-ubsan.  And the compiled result of
>> imm-load1.c seems OK.
> And it's doing correct thing for Glibc "improved generic string
> functions" patch, producing some really tight loop now.
>
In the process of debugging, I found this,bringing the immediate number 
load instruction out of the loop is done in loop2_invariant optimization.

One of the conditions for extraction is that the destination register 
cannot be used more than once, and the sequence before it was modified 
was like this：

(insn 12 11 13 3 (set (reg:DI 90)
         (const_int 16842752 [0x1010000])) "test.c":13:12 discrim 1 131 
{*movdi_64bit}
      (nil))
(insn 13 12 14 3 (set (reg:DI 91)
         (ior:DI (reg:DI 90)
             (const_int 257 [0x101]))) "test.c":13:12 discrim 1 88 {iordi3}
      (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 90)
         (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 16843009 [0x1010101])
             (nil))))

(insn 14 13 15 3 (set (reg:DI 91)
         (ior:DI (zero_extend:DI (subreg:SI (reg:DI 91) 0))
             (const_int 282578783305728 [0x1010100000000]))) 
"test.c":13:12 discrim 1 150 {lu32i_d}
      (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 282578800148737 [0x1010101010101])
         (nil)))
(insn 15 14 17 3 (set (reg:DI 91)
         (ior:DI (and:DI (reg:DI 91)
                 (const_int 4503599627370495 [0xfffffffffffff]))
             (const_int 72057594037927936 [0x100000000000000]))) 
"test.c":13:12 discrim 1 151 {lu52i_d}
      (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 72340172838076673 [0x101010101010101])
         (nil)))

Therefore, the last two instructions do not meet the extraction conditions.

But because of the implementation of our instructions, I freed myself up 
immediately to do it loop2_invariant later, so I avoided this problem.