From: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Fix condition of define_expand vec_shr_<mode> [PR100645]
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:41:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b067dfb-5091-5773-e9c8-ab9fad8042f7@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220922213923.GJ25951@gate.crashing.org>
Hi Segher,
Thanks for the comments!
on 2022/9/23 05:39, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Heh, I first thought I had mistyped thgew PR #, but it is this one after
> all :-)
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 09:41:34AM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> PR100645 exposes one latent bug in define_expand vec_shr_<mode>
>> that the current condition TARGET_ALTIVEC is too loose. The
>> mode iterator VEC_L contains a few modes, they are not always
>> supported as vector mode, VECTOR_UNIT_ALTIVEC_OR_VSX_P should
>> be used like some other VEC_L usages.
>
>> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/vector.md
>> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/vector.md
>> @@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ (define_expand "vec_shr_<mode>"
>> [(match_operand:VEC_L 0 "vlogical_operand")
>> (match_operand:VEC_L 1 "vlogical_operand")
>> (match_operand:QI 2 "reg_or_short_operand")]
>> - "TARGET_ALTIVEC"
>> + "VECTOR_UNIT_ALTIVEC_OR_VSX_P (<MODE>mode)"
>
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr100645.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_altivec_ok } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power6 -maltivec" } */
>
> This is a strange choice: we normally do not enable VMX on p6. Just use
> p7 instead? There is no need for altivec_ok in any case, the -mcpu=
> guarantees it is satisfied.
Unfortunately a single power7 doesn't work for this case, since it (VSX) makes
rs6000_vector_mem[TImode] not VECTOR_NONE any more, we need one extra -mno-vsx
to reproduce this.
As you mentioned above, power6 doesn't enable altivec by default, I noticed
altivec_ok excludes some envs like aix 5.3 etc., and also ensures it's fine
to have an explicit maltivec there, so I added it for robustness.
>
>> +/* It's to verify no ICE here. */
>
> "This used to ICE."?
Updated.
>
> Please commit this now, looks good. Thanks!
>
Committed in r13-2844. Thanks!
BR,
Kewen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-26 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-22 1:41 Kewen.Lin
2022-09-22 21:39 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-26 5:41 ` Kewen.Lin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b067dfb-5091-5773-e9c8-ab9fad8042f7@linux.ibm.com \
--to=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).