From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20824 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2007 13:49:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 20809 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2007 13:49:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.229) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:49:30 +0000 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 67so1399402wri for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 05:49:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.100.2 with SMTP id x2mr2123599agb.1168264168992; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 05:49:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.70.5 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 05:49:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6c33472e0701080549h5ca6a8d4td8dcf7a2cc9efff4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:49:00 -0000 From: "=?UTF-8?Q?Manuel_L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez?=" To: gcc , gcc-patches Subject: C++ overflow testcases failing on mainline MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00572.txt.bz2 Dear all, It seems I managed to mess up the patch applied to revision 120558. The problem is that somehow all testcases have been added three times. I cannot imagine how such thing happenned. Anyway, I will fix it today as soon as I put my hands in my laptop. Is it better to revert and re-apply the original patch or just fix the testcases? I would guess that the former is the better since the original patch bootstrapped and regression tested without problems. Sorry for the inconvenience. Manuel.