From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32547 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2009 16:03:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 32429 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2009 16:03:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f226.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f226.google.com) (209.85.219.226) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:03:42 +0000 Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so6634257ewy.29 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:03:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.141 with SMTP id c13mr2981981wef.66.1256141020198; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:03:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AD96221.8080205@redhat.com> References: <4AD96221.8080205@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6dc9ffc80910210903v57bd485dtc93789b2ed962b4a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: C++ PATCH for c++/38798 (auto f() -> struct A {}) From: "H.J. Lu" To: Jason Merrill Cc: gcc-patches List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg01364.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: > DR 770 clarified that we shouldn't try to parse a class or enum-specifier= in > the context of a trailing return type. =A0I've implemented that with a fl= ag > passed down into cp_parser_type_specifier. > > Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applied to trunk. > Hi Jason, You removed 4 testcases: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/auto12.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/auto13.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/auto6.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/auto8.C But there are no ChangeLog entries. Is that intentional? Thanks. --=20 H.J.